508,083 active members
3,732 visitors online
Register for free
Login
Page 1 of 2 12
Results 1 to 12 of 20
  1. #1
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    250

    Another pendant question

    So the pendant available for the M and MX doesn't say much about it but I wonder if there is any reason it wouldn't work with a regular 1100 running path pilot.... Can't see it listed separately anyway and I would imagine it's pretty spendy if it was.

    Anyone using it?
    M

  2. #2
    Gold Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3008

    Re: Another pendant question

    Looks like it is an $1800 add-on for the M and MX mills and includes the controller, offsetting what would be the $800 cost for the standard controller. Looks pretty nifty but it's a bit too spendy for me as an 1100 Series 3 add-on even if it were available.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1451

    Re: Another pendant question

    See file:///C:/Users/ken/Downloads/TD10715_PathPilot_Operator_Console_770_1019A.pdf for the manual on the controller.

  4. #4
    Registered
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    104

    Re: Another pendant question

    Quote Originally Posted by kstrauss View Post
    See file:///C:/Users/ken/Downloads/TD10715_PathPilot_Operator_Console_770_1019A.pdf for the manual on the controller.
    That's a link to your computer. Here's the link on Tormach's site
    https://www.tormach.com/support/wpdm...for-770m-m-mx/

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by kstrauss View Post
    See file:///C:/Users/ken/Downloads/TD10715_PathPilot_Operator_Console_770_1019A.pdf for the manual on the controller.
    That's a link to your computer. Here's the link on Tormach's site
    https://www.tormach.com/support/wpdm...for-770m-m-mx/
    "You can't teach stuff in a school that you would learn in real life unless the real life people are in charge of the school." - Gene Sherman

  5. #5
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    250

    Re: Another pendant question

    I was just wondering if the pendant alone (p/n 50363 according to that doc) was going to be available and if it would work with any version of the control and PP and not just the M / MX mills
    M

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1451

    Re: Another pendant question

    My excuse is that someone was ringing my doorbell and I just pressed SEND without checking anything. My bad!

  7. #7
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    655

    Re: Another pendant question

    Why not just order one of the Ninja Pendants? Much more control than the Tormach one. I've got three of them, one for the Slant Pro and two for the 1100Ms. Absolutely love them!

    Moonlight Prototype
    The Body Armor Dude - Andrew

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    102

    Re: Another pendant question

    It would be nice if/when Tormach releases just the pendant. A MPG you could count on it working when pathpilot updates would be nice. Looks like Moonlight is trying to keep up with patches at least. VistaCNC just flat gave up. It wouldn't surprise me, or offend me if Tormach was actively making pathpilot only work with their hardware either. Hopefully they will have the new control panel available for the slant pro as well.
    -Jon

  9. #9

    Re: Another pendant question

    The a shame about the VistaCNC pendants not getting updates. I use one with UCCNC and it's ungodly good.

  10. #10
    Registered
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    330

    Re: Another pendant question

    It should be possible to make a patch that works "for almost all new versions."
    The trick would be to get some user-installed code to run on start-up, and that code can check whether the patch is installed, and if not, re-apply it, using context patching.
    If the patch fails to apply cleanly, because exactly the bit that needs updating has changed, the patch could disable itself and display a message to the user before continuing with an un-patched start.
    This all has to happen before the linuxcnc process itself stats up, though, so that the Python code it loads is the patched version after an update.
    Just dropping a .desktop file in the startup folder is not sufficient, though, because there's a race condition between which starts sooner, the patcher or the PathPilot.

  11. #11
    Registered
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    655

    Re: Another pendant question

    Quote Originally Posted by jwatte View Post
    It should be possible to make a patch that works "for almost all new versions."
    The trick would be to get some user-installed code to run on start-up, and that code can check whether the patch is installed, and if not, re-apply it, using context patching.
    If the patch fails to apply cleanly, because exactly the bit that needs updating has changed, the patch could disable itself and display a message to the user before continuing with an un-patched start.
    This all has to happen before the linuxcnc process itself stats up, though, so that the Python code it loads is the patched version after an update.
    Just dropping a .desktop file in the startup folder is not sufficient, though, because there's a race condition between which starts sooner, the patcher or the PathPilot.
    Pete has that with his pendant. He sends out an update patch to run each time that PathPilot has an update. Or at least he has to check and make sure it's compatible.
    The Body Armor Dude - Andrew

  12. #12
    Registered
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    250

    Re: Another pendant question

    Quote Originally Posted by smokediver576 View Post
    Pete has that with his pendant. He sends out an update patch to run each time that PathPilot has an update. Or at least he has to check and make sure it's compatible.
    That's what I'm worried about now. Tormach changes something and all of a sudden my aftermarket peripheral no longer works unless the company updates their end. (as was the case with Vista) I can't imagine the Tormach one being cost effective but at least it'll probably stay supported
    M

Page 1 of 2 12

Similar Threads

  1. vickers 2100 pendant question
    By relaxed1 in forum Controller & Computer Solutions
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-03-2011, 09:23 PM
  2. Pendant question
    By nelZ in forum CamSoft Products
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-16-2008, 12:27 AM
  3. DIY Mach-3 pendant question
    By Ferny in forum Mach Software (ArtSoft software)
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-02-2008, 06:00 AM
  4. pendant question
    By yukonho in forum Mach Mill
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-24-2005, 02:27 AM
  5. Pendant?
    By CNCadmin in forum Carken Products (Deskam, DeskCNC etc)
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-07-2004, 03:10 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •