Servo idea - elimated backlash - zero backlash !
Here is an advanced idea that is quite feasable and completely possible.
When you get backlash on your system, it has to be compensated, and as I understand it, software can compensate for it, but how well, and to what resolution? I can imagine it being even worse when trying to engrave back and forth on something very small and fine.
Usually the servo motor drive has an encoder on the rear, so your software/electronics knows exactly where the motor position is.
The idea is to have the optical encoder not read directly from the motor shaft, but from the gantry position itself.
A simple construction of this is to have an optical encoder operated by a thin tight high tensile wire attached to the gantry and running across to the encoder shaft, on the side of the machine. (less moving wires too!)
Or the wire fixed at each end and running along the axis, and wrapped a couple of times around the encoder shaft (specially made pulley, like in an old wind up clock mech.) The encoder which is mounted on the gantry.
I am sure there are more methods of actual construction, including an optical laser based position sensor? (prone to dust though) and I ask anyone, if they have any thoughts on this, to reply & include them here.
The reason I mention this is that my servo gearbox (3:1) has some noticable backlash within the gearing, and I'm thinking of ways to eliminate it, as I've not yet had any experience with a complete machine. Still building!
My intro: http://www.cnczone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=27905
My gallery: http://www.cnczone.com/gallery/showg...0/ppuser/36476
Thanks
Tony
Servo + Backlash = Bad News
The problem with having mechanical backlash in a servo drivetrain is that it becomes impossible to tune the servo system for any kind of performance. That is because as you tighten up the parameters to get decent accel and decel, everything gets thrown off when the drivetrain is in the backlash area where there is very little inertia. Usually the system resonates and jacks off, trying to beat itself and the crummy gearbox to pieces. You can crap up the tuning on it so that it moves, sort of, but then it will only perform as well as a much less expensive alternative.
I ran into this by subbing out engineering on a very expensive retrofit of a special purpose machine, once in a different life. The thing had a LOT of backlash, and turned out to be unsuitable for the servo control installed on it. It didn't need servos, but the whole retro system was built around them and installed, and the machine didn't work. The servos on this system cost over $12,000. What I ended up doing to fix the problem was to invent a timing belt transmission and install it at my expense, to replace the gearbox. The thing worked after that, and I didn't sub out any engineering any more.
Short version of the story is that it can be expensive to discover that servos need tight coupling to the load.
--97T--