1 Attachment(s)
Re: Need help with g-codes for my CNC mill, I'm new and bad at it any help is appreci
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bob La Londe
Active. No. Still accurately showing its relative position when you switch back to it. Yes. What's the point in having multiple work offsets if they do not remain accurate when you are using a different one. They do. Switch from one to another and back causes no harm. Unless you have a crappy machine with a partial instruction set implementation the control still knows where it is. That's the whole point.
I am familiar with Mr Warfield's website and huge concatenation of other people's work. I'll leave it at that.
I adequately proved my point.
I guess I'll just have to accept that you are one of those jackasses who thinks screaming the loudest and longest makes you right. I'll let you keep screaming, but I am done with you. Go ahead. Rant on little boy.
Bob La Londe
Yuma, Az
No I'm not screaming, you will know when I do that, you have proved who the jackasses is in this case, for not being able to comprehend basic G-code and how it is written (wedge)
You have not proved any point at all, you have shown how little you do know about the subject :)
Nobody has said there is any cause of accuracy change, making stuff up is making you look ridiculous :rolleyes:
You still don't get it at all the work offset does not change and nobody said it did,
I guess Faunc have it all wrong as well, because the snips I posted, that you said where wrong all came from the Faunc manual so who is looking a little----- right now ;)
Here is a nice snip of how a G53 works not quite enough wording but enough to get your dentures grinding :)
Re: Need help with g-codes for my CNC mill, I'm new and bad at it any help is appreci
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Bob La Londe
Active. No. Still accurately showing its relative position when you switch back to it. Yes. What's the point in having multiple work offsets if they do not remain accurate when you are using a different one. They do. Switch from one to another and back causes no harm. Unless you have a crappy machine with a partial instruction set implementation the control still knows where it is. That's the whole point.
I am familiar with Mr Warfield's website and huge concatenation of other people's work. I'll leave it at that.
I adequately proved my point.
I guess I'll just have to accept that you are one of those jackasses who thinks screaming the loudest and longest makes you right. I'll let you keep screaming, but I am done with you. Go ahead. Rant on little boy.
Bob La Londe
Yuma, Az
No you have proved who the jackasses is in this case, for not being able to comprehend basic G-code and how it is written (wedge)
You have not proved any point at all, you have shown how little you do know :)
Nobody has said there is any cause of accuracy change, making stuff up is making you look ridiculous :rolleyes:
You still don't get it at all the work offset does not change and nobody said it did,
I guess Faunc have it all wrong as well, because the snips I posted came from the Faunc manual ;)
Here is a nice snip of how a G53 works not quite enough wording but enough to get your dentures grinding :)