585,997 active members*
4,920 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    0

    anti backlash solution

    Hi,

    I need a critique of this decision.
    What do you think?
    this might work?

    ----------
    P.S: Sorry for my English.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Nut1.JPG  

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    8082
    I don't see anything that holds the nut into the block when there is axial thrust in both directions. You would need more than the O rings to hold them together. A larger flange with two or three screws through it into the block is needed. The "fingers" of the nut look ok. These need to be allowed to flex but also have constant tension on them.

    CarveOne
    CarveOne
    http://www.carveonecncwoodcraft.com

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    226
    Not a bad idea at all.. the tension of the O-ring AND the compression of its rubber as well (assuming you get the fit that tight) I'm just thinking that any lube on the screw will climb the kerf and if not rubber friendly, harden the O-ring over time, but no light exposure is good... it should be fine for many years...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    0
    I don't see anything that holds the nut into the block when there is axial thrust in both directions. You would need more than the O rings to hold them together. A larger flange with two or three screws through it into the block is needed. The "fingers" of the nut look ok. These need to be allowed to flex but also have constant tension on them.
    This is an example. In fact, the flange nut is held with two screws.
    O-rings are not used to hold the nuts.
    O-rings should only implement backlash compensation.
    My question is the possibility of backlash compensation. This may work?

    ----------
    P.S: Sorry for my English.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2392
    That system was used on some of the early Hewlett Packard large frame dot matrix printers. Actually they used circular springs but the same principle.

    It works well for removing backlash but is only suitable for REALLY light loads like moving a printhead because it is flexible and elastic in both radial directions, and it's most flexible at the compression point where the actual drive takes place, and that is the worst point to have the flexibility.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    8082
    Quote Originally Posted by elteks View Post
    This is an example. In fact, the flange nut is held with two screws.
    O-rings are not used to hold the nuts.
    O-rings should only implement backlash compensation.
    My question is the possibility of backlash compensation. This may work?

    ----------
    P.S: Sorry for my English.
    Yes, it will work. How well it will work is determined by how much the axial thrust loads along the length of the Acme screws are. Some testing of a sample part should be done to see how well it works for your application.

    CarveOne
    CarveOne
    http://www.carveonecncwoodcraft.com

Similar Threads

  1. Anti Whip solution for long screws?
    By georgeburns in forum DIY CNC Router Table Machines
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 06-29-2019, 10:42 AM
  2. anti backlash nut?
    By sixpence in forum DIY CNC Router Table Machines
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-18-2007, 07:51 PM
  3. Anti Backlash
    By sala84 in forum Commercial CNC Wood Routers
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-05-2006, 03:04 PM
  4. Are those anti-backlash
    By CnC_BoY in forum Linear and Rotary Motion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-21-2006, 04:58 AM
  5. Anti-backlash nut
    By mikeschn in forum DIY CNC Router Table Machines
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 01-27-2004, 05:55 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •