Need Dust Management Ideas for Router Table
I am looking for some ideas for managing the dust from my self-built CNC gantry machine which sits in the middle of my shop.
Since I also have several precision metal machines (two full size metal milling machines and two large metal lathes) in close proximity, they end up having dust settling on a lot of the critical parts that I would really like to keep clean, such as the lathe bed, milling vises, etc...
Using a cover on the metal machines would be extremely impractical and would cause more problems than it would solve, so I'm primarily looking for a way to manage the dust right at the source.
I would preferably want something ready made so that I don't have to spend a lot of time making something myself. For example, the "Down Under Dust Port" from Rockler (part# 25893) looked enticing, but I don't think it would work with my setup since I don't use a router base in the router holder of my machine. So considering the construction of gantry machines, I had considered: A) Attaching something to the router itself such as the above mentioned Down Under Dust Port. B) Putting some kind of under-table dust collection system that would work like a downdraft table (holes would be drilled in the perimeter of the table and dust channels constructed underneath connected to a 2 HP dust collector that I already have). C) Some type of overhead "hood" which could also be connected to the 2HP dust collector.
To be clear, I'm most concerned about airborne dust that settles on my other machines, not larger chips on the table surface, those get blown aside from the fan in the router. So far the under-table system seems the most practical as it would be out of the way, but I don't know if it would work that well as far as pulling the light airborne dust from the router. The overhead hood system seems like it would work the best for filtering the airborne dust coming from the system, but would tend to be in the way I think. The direct router attachment seems to be ideal, but it would be the most difficult to implement, and such a system would probably get in the way as far as changing bits, and could cause interference on some toolpaths.
So I'm just wondering if anyone has any ideas that might work better. Thanks!
He is more machine now than man.....