Re: Breakdown of Okuma Lathe Tool Call
I never have understood why you would ever want a Radius comp register different from the tool#. Has anyone ever used a tool with 2 different radii?
hy mr wizard in case it matters, i have used different radius on same tool, in order to run multiple finish operations ( if i remember, at least extra 2 ), on a precision conical surface, with full depth control for each pass; igf allows only XZsetting, and i don't know how that affect tapered surfaces; it was easier to use a tricky code, rather than testing how igf behaves
radius was initialized & changed from code, with system variables, and the tool was always using same T comand
another time when i messed the radius, was for a roughing cycle, where shape had a radius < tool radius, so i tricked it
before 2 spindle lathes, i started using T = LINK * 101 / 10101 for 1st offset, and T = LINK * 101 / 10101 + 200020 for 2nd offset, thus always using #1-12 for main, and #20-32 for 2nd; like this, difference between main and 2nd was always 20, and i only had to type 1 or 2 digits to initialize a T comand, rather than 6; back then, i called it progress
but that formula did no longer work for 2 spindle lathes, because offset number was limited to 32, so i had to forget that method, and use a new one, that would satisfy both single and dual spindle lathes : i started using T= LINK * 100 for a short while, thus no longer having the offset and radius sent to the machine through the T comand, but through shape; i only used that for short time, because it's simplicity required much more background work
all the best mr wizard
Ladyhawke - My Delirium, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_bFO1SNRZg