584,837 active members*
5,103 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
IndustryArena Forum > Hobby Projects > I.C. Engines > Radial Master Con Rod Design
Page 1 of 2 12
Results 1 to 20 of 21
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    430

    Radial Master Con Rod Design

    I posted this in the Engineering forum, but I'm getting no replies :/

    so I'm designing a 5 cylinder Radial, with a bore diameter of 1.1" and 1" stroke (might increase stroke length). I'm having trouble with the Master con rod. I'm unsure of where to put the 4 slave rod connecting points. It can't be the typical 72 degrees (360/5), since TDC and BDC isn't 72 Deg on the crank relative to the master con rod.

    I've taken some pics of the assembly, and drew an approximate motion path of the 3rd con rod connection point. It's sort of an ellipse, on an angle. I've tried making the master con rod longer and shorter, and moved the connection point around, but still doesn't make a circular path.

    Is this typical for this type of crank/ con rod arrangement on radial engines?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Image1.jpg   crank2.jpg  
    Shaun
    my x2 conversion ------> http://www.cnczone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=36403

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    4519
    I could be wrong, but maybe you are thinking about this wrong. First, to have even power pulses and to help maintain balance of rotating assembly, 72 degrees is actually the answer. If concerned about spark and valve timing, that would be adjusted on your camshaft and distributor.

    Have you consulted Google for drawings to see what has come before? I think for something like this, there is no reason to "re-invent the wheel". I doubt you have in mind any major improvements for performance or reliability. Just copy what others have done.

    http://www.enginehistory.org/ModelEn.../HydraRods.jpg

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1195
    skmetal7,
    What material u plan to use for con rod and also what mat for crankshaft? What usually factory use for those materials? Thanks.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    430
    Quote Originally Posted by txcncman View Post
    I could be wrong, but maybe you are thinking about this wrong. First, to have even power pulses and to help maintain balance of rotating assembly, 72 degrees is actually the answer. If concerned about spark and valve timing, that would be adjusted on your camshaft and distributor.

    Have you consulted Google for drawings to see what has come before? I think for something like this, there is no reason to "re-invent the wheel". I doubt you have in mind any major improvements for performance or reliability. Just copy what others have done.

    http://www.enginehistory.org/ModelEn.../HydraRods.jpg
    That's the Hydra engine. It's a rare example if radials, with an even number of cylinders, and therefore suffered from sever vibrations at certian RPMs, and was later scrapped. If you look at the master con rod closely, you can see that its not evenly spaced. This engine also used an overhead cam design, which is really interesting, and allows exact timing of each cylinder independently. I'm using the traditional cam around the crank design. So I can't adjust timing independently; each lobe on the cam has to be in time with the first cylinder.

    asuratman: I haven't got that far in choosing a material, but I would probably use a type of aluminum for the con rod, like 7075 T6, or Fortal from an ebay reseller. The crank would be some form of steel like 1144 stressproof
    Shaun
    my x2 conversion ------> http://www.cnczone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=36403

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    4519
    Ok. Why can't you incorporate 5 cam points into your design? Might make for a slightly longer crankcase, but I do not see that as an issue since you are probably doing this as a hobby project anyway. Otherwise, go and buy a 5 cylinder radial engine of appropriate size.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    603
    If you don't get an answer here, try the Home Model Engine Machinest website. I have seen the subject discussed at length but can't remember where.

    I know what your talking about and I have seen the fix. Don't remember where.

    Sorry

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    76
    A bit confused with your drawings as I can't seem to follow what you are trying to achieve here. If the yellow rod is the master then you have it all wrong. Master is a fixed rod as in photo below.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails main-connecting-rod-5-cylinder-radial-engine-1299433053-sm[1].jpg  

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    430
    Quote Originally Posted by txcncman View Post
    Ok. Why can't you incorporate 5 cam points into your design? Might make for a slightly longer crankcase, but I do not see that as an issue since you are probably doing this as a hobby project anyway.
    Interesting suggestion, i might try that if all else fails.


    Quote Originally Posted by txcncman View Post
    Otherwise, go and buy a 5 cylinder radial engine of appropriate size.
    but what's the fun in that?


    stevehuckss396: YES someone knows what I'm talking about!! :P I took a quick look over at that site and didn't find much, just a mention of it. I'll keep looking. Oh and your V8 is awesome, along with cforcht's.
    Shaun
    my x2 conversion ------> http://www.cnczone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=36403

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    708
    You may be over complicating it. See the 7 cylinder radial master connecting rod below. The angular spacing is even. It is just that one of the slave big-end bearings appears to be missing because the master rod has a solid bridge in that location.

    The principle would be the same for a 5, 7 or 9 cylinder radial.


    Also see animated GIF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Radial_engine.gif

    .
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 7-cyl-radial-master-rod.jpg  

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    430
    Quote Originally Posted by dynosor View Post
    You may be over complicating it. See the 7 cylinder radial master connecting rod below. The angular spacing is even. It is just that one of the slave big-end bearings appears to be missing because the master rod has a solid bridge in that location.

    The principle would be the same for a 5, 7 or 9 cylinder radial.


    Also see animated GIF: File:Radial engine.gif - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    .
    Hmm, do you know what engine that's from? Maybe they didn't bother with correcting it. I remember reading on the 5Bears website: Crankshaft and Connecting Rods and he shows the master con rod, and explains that it has been corrected for TDC.
    Shaun
    my x2 conversion ------> http://www.cnczone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=36403

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    708
    Quote Originally Posted by skmetal7 View Post
    Hmm, do you know what engine that's from? Maybe they didn't bother with correcting it. I remember reading on the 5Bears website: Crankshaft and Connecting Rods and he shows the master con rod, and explains that it has been corrected for TDC.

    This rod in my picture is from an OS engine - all parts shown in this pic : http://www.osengines.com/engines/osmg1307-parts-b.jpg

    http://www.osengines.com/engines/osmg1307-inset-1b.jpg

    http://manuals.hobbico.com/osm/fr7-420-manual.pdf

    I can see how packaging can force the slave rod bigend bearings to be placed on a pattern that is not circular and how the individual rods may have different lenghts (not desirable). On the other hand, the combined load from multiple connecting rods on the master rod would tend to take up the slack and rotate it slightly one way or the other - I can see how slave rod bearing placement may be used to correct such motion.

    If I was building a model radial I would ensure that all cylinders had the same stroke length and all reach TDC. The goal would be to use the same part for the slave conrods and to keep things simple. If this resulted in a slightly lumpy firing order I am not sure it would bother me - I am still not convinced that special intervention is required, but will take a look at you link and see where it leads.

    Meanwhile you can browse this full size modern radial manufacturer's pics for inspiration: ROTEC RADIAL phototour

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    603
    Quote Originally Posted by skmetal7 View Post
    I took a quick look over at that site and didn't find much, just a mention of it. I'll keep looking. Oh and your V8 is awesome, along with cforcht's.

    I'll post the question and see what I can dig up


    EDIT: I just asked the question, give it a day or two.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    430
    steve: Thanks! Looks like a good discussion is brewing over there. I read the PDF that petertha posted and that is exactly what I was looking for! So it seems there is a compromise with all radials. Nice to know. I made an account with HMEM so I'll be posting some things over there.

    dynosor: yea I want all the cylinders/ pistons/ conrods to be the same length. I guess I'll have to compromise with the BDC/TDC.
    Shaun
    my x2 conversion ------> http://www.cnczone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=36403

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    708
    I just sent an e-mail to Paul Chernikeeff, the director of engineering at ROTEC to ask if he would be willing to explain how the slave rod bigend bearing positions are determined around the master rod.

    It can't hurt to ask...

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    603
    Quote Originally Posted by skmetal7 View Post
    steve: Thanks! Looks like a good discussion is brewing over there. I read the PDF that petertha posted and that is exactly what I was looking for! So it seems there is a compromise with all radials. Nice to know. I made an account with HMEM so I'll be posting some things over there.
    Good deal! I was about to post a link.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    708
    Quote Originally Posted by stevehuckss396 View Post
    I was about to post a link.

    Please do. Now that you have some of us curious, we would like to know too.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    603
    Quote Originally Posted by dynosor View Post
    Please do. Now that you have some of us curious, we would like to know too.
    Sorry about that.

    Master rod layout

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    708
    Quote Originally Posted by stevehuckss396 View Post
    Thanks Steve. I found Petertha's documents explaining master rod layout there.

    Here is a direct link: http://www.homemodelenginemachinist....0;attach=23131 - it is possible that one has to be registered to view.

    The posts by Petertha in the middle of the thread have PDFs attached - you have to look carefully to notice.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    603
    It's a great site for the model engine guys. Some very smart and talented people hang out there. I especially like there taste in projects of the month!

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    708
    Juat ask these guys to show you how to build one from scratch:

    Rotec Radial Engine 150hp - YouTube

Page 1 of 2 12

Similar Threads

  1. CNC Radial Engine
    By MMT in forum I.C. Engines
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 04-27-2012, 05:56 PM
  2. Radial Engine, Master Con Rod
    By skmetal7 in forum Mechanical Calculations/Engineering Design
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-22-2011, 04:51 AM
  3. radial 5 cilynder
    By tonycorse in forum I.C. Engines
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 04-18-2010, 08:06 AM
  4. Cox radial engine
    By mrplentyolde in forum I.C. Engines
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-10-2010, 04:03 AM
  5. Radial Groove
    By skmetal7 in forum PTC Pro/Manufacture
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 04-04-2010, 02:01 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •