Originally Posted by
nitewatchman
Shavings,
If I came across out of line or condescending it was not my intention.
I too read the manual before using my fourth axis for the first time and was aware of the "leak" and adding oil until it leaked out, BUT I had paid enough for the little fella to get concerned about seeing "NO OIL IN THE SIGHT GLASS". While I was sure that it was okay per what I had read in the manual I still checked and rechecked the oil level to assure that oil was on the ring gear. I also probably should have asked the question on the forum, in the panic I didn't think of it.
So I guess I can be put in that same class of people that need to be poked with a sharp stick or those that should RTFM. In my opinion, this is the place to reach out to our peers that have "been there" and "done that" to make sure that interpretations of manuals, concepts, and ideas are correct. I teach sessions and classes within our company about how to design and build Railway Special Trackwork (switches, turnouts and diamond crossings) on my day job. One common problems is that people will ask questions one on one after the session that would have been beneficial for all to hear and participate in the discussion. One of the biggest reason they didn't ask the question in the session is peer ridicule and smart ass statements that lead to silence and embarassment.
Maybe we should all (this post included) read a post back after it has been typed as if it is directed at us personally with sensitivity towards condescension, sarcasm, belittlement, offensive tone or language, superiority, etc. before hitting the send key.
Not meaning to challenge or offend, just saying---
nitewatchman