585,753 active members*
4,489 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
IndustryArena Forum > MetalWorking Machines > Novakon > Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?
Page 1 of 2 12
Results 1 to 20 of 37
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    701

    Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    Anyone have issues w/ ESS being too sensitive? I get weird E-Stop errors at different times - but what is consistent is if I manually click to start "Flood" coolant while a program is running it ALWAYS throws a E-Stop error.
    Shouldn't I be able to do this without the machine freaking out?

    BTW - its a Pulsar Stepper that I'm using.

    Thanks!
    B

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    594

    Re: Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    I'm no expert but that sounds like electromagnetic interference. The relay controlling the coolant pump might be a place to look for some shielding.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    6618

    Re: Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    I have never had mine throw and Estop that was not intended and preformed manually. In fact no switch errors of any kind.
    I did have a coolant pump go out, but John sent me a new one. I do start and stop both the spindle and the coolant at times without running Gcode, so I know mine does not fault like that.
    Do you have any other electronics or machinery in close proximity?

    I think maybe the only real difference between mine and yours is the position I installed the servo drive in.
    Mine was not installed when I received it, so I had to install it later. These are older pictures. I do have the newer Arduino BOB installed in mine and the never reference above was after it was installed. I had a few issues with the original BOB.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails upper control.jpg   lower control.jpg  
    Lee

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    701

    Re: Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    Lee - I can start and stop the spindle and coolant manually no problem as long as G code isn't running (i.e. manual mode)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    326

    Re: Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    Yeah- sounds like you have narrowed it down. If this flood pump is on a contactor then you'll need a contactor (relay) snubber). There should be one on any/all contactors and relays in a CNC environment I've been told. Link below and of course google relay snubber.

    Cornell-Dubilier - 104M06QC150 - EMI/RFI Shielding/Suppression - Signal Filters - Allied Electronics

    You may want to check into Shielding of wire sets (power sets) or route away from control lines and PCB boards. Create a metal shield divider or surround can (faraday cage) to help.

    Grounding- Do you have a clean earth ground for your rig? I used to see a lot of issues related to nothing more than grounding properly.

    Just some thoughts. Best of luck, CG.

  6. #6

    Re: Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    Quote Originally Posted by brianbonedoc View Post
    Anyone have issues w/ ESS being too sensitive? I get weird E-Stop errors at different times - but what is consistent is if I manually click to start "Flood" coolant while a program is running it ALWAYS throws a E-Stop error.
    Shouldn't I be able to do this without the machine freaking out?

    BTW - its a Pulsar Stepper that I'm using.

    Thanks!
    B
    I have the same problem with my Torus pro. It often throws an estop if I start the washdown pump. And I get Estops for no reason while the machine just sits still or is running.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    6618

    Re: Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    Okay.
    My Pulsar does estop when I use the wash down pump. I think that may be a safety. You don't want to be able to wash the machine down with it running. You should keep your hands clear when that is happening.
    Sitting idle and estopping did occur with my Torus, but doesn't on the Pulsar.
    Lee

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    480

    Re: Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    I reversed my vfd 180 to get the inductive load wiring away from the Bob wiring. Most my problems went away. Also "zero crossing" solid state relays can reduce EMI significantly. I've never used a coolant pump though.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    701

    Re: Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    Thanks for the tips - sounds like it's just a function of the machines unfortunately

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    701

    Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    I put a bunch of Ferrite cores around different wiring such as the AC input, and the limit switch wiring.
    I am still getting random E-Stops that are driving me nuts. The mill can be chugging along no problem, and then BAM, throws an E-Stop!!

    The other thing that seems to be happening is that chips can trigger the limit switches, but this is less of an issue than those random e-stops.

    What is the Arduino BOB Lee is talking about? Maybe that would solve the issues? I have the same BOB pictured above, Rev 1.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    63

    Re: Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    The best location for a ferrite bead (core) is on the ESTOP wire near the BOB. Better yet both wires leading to the ESTOP should go through the same ferrite bead to prevent a glitch on the common signal from making it appear ESTOP triggered. Ferrite beads on AC signals going to anything that draws decent current will be useless as the ferrite bead will saturate on every AC transition. Low amperage AC limit switch inputs might not saturate but will likely not be the issue anyway.

    The practice of using a single ground point will clear up much of the noise on signals. Instead of one board / device grounded to another then jumping to another and another in series they all should go to one common location. The use of shielded cable between the ESTOP switch and BOB and grounded at BOB end only will dramatically reduce noise pickup. Using a metal backplane instead of plastic / fiberglass that is grounded behind the BOB will add additional shielding to the system.

    Charlie.

    Quote Originally Posted by brianbonedoc View Post
    I put a bunch of Ferrite cores around different wiring such as the AC input, and the limit switch wiring.
    I am still getting random E-Stops that are driving me nuts. The mill can be chugging along no problem, and then BAM, throws an E-Stop!!

    The other thing that seems to be happening is that chips can trigger the limit switches, but this is less of an issue than those random e-stops.

    What is the Arduino BOB Lee is talking about? Maybe that would solve the issues? I have the same BOB pictured above, Rev 1.
    Visit http://www.shadowspawnllc.com to see what enhancements I have available for the NM-145.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    701

    Re: Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    Quote Originally Posted by cteufert View Post
    The best location for a ferrite bead (core) is on the ESTOP wire near the BOB. Better yet both wires leading to the ESTOP should go through the same ferrite bead to prevent a glitch on the common signal from making it appear ESTOP triggered. Ferrite beads on AC signals going to anything that draws decent current will be useless as the ferrite bead will saturate on every AC transition. Low amperage AC limit switch inputs might not saturate but will likely not be the issue anyway.

    The practice of using a single ground point will clear up much of the noise on signals. Instead of one board / device grounded to another then jumping to another and another in series they all should go to one common location. The use of shielded cable between the ESTOP switch and BOB and grounded at BOB end only will dramatically reduce noise pickup. Using a metal backplane instead of plastic / fiberglass that is grounded behind the BOB will add additional shielding to the system.

    Charlie.

    Charlie - thanks for the knowledge. I just put about 10 of them on a bunch of different wires including the limit switch wiring to the BOB. I will take the ones off the AC input as you suggested, and put em on the E-stop wires right at the input to the BOB.

    Also - noticed yesterday the E-stop triggered during some heavy roughing. Not sure if theres a feedback loop to the servo driver that threw an error or what.

    Again - thanks for the info and I will report back.

    Brian

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    7063

    Re: Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    FWIW - Ferrite cores are completely useless in terms of preventing functional problems like you're seeing. They operate at extreme high frequencies - 10s to 100s of MHz - FAR beyond anything the logic can respond to. They are used to reduce EMI emissions only. If you suspect noise on an E-Stop or limit input, add a small capacitor between the signal and GND - 0.01uF or so. Ferrites will do no good at all.

    Regards,
    Ray L.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    701

    Re: Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    Quote Originally Posted by SCzEngrgGroup View Post
    FWIW - Ferrite cores are completely useless in terms of preventing functional problems like you're seeing. They operate at extreme high frequencies - 10s to 100s of MHz - FAR beyond anything the logic can respond to. They are used to reduce EMI emissions only. If you suspect noise on an E-Stop or limit input, add a small capacitor between the signal and GND - 0.01uF or so. Ferrites will do no good at all.

    Regards,
    Ray L.
    Ray - good idea! The problem w/ the random e-stops is they are not consistent and hard to tell if the intervention did anything.
    I will try the capacitor as you suggested.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    204

    Re: Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    I had two issues with my estop and ss board. One was I had the estop in a metal duplex box mounted (replaced with a plastic one) on the wall and it was picking up interference in the shop from surrounding equip, and to remove the last little bit of problem ( i put a cap in the estop circuit for filtering).

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    701

    Re: Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    Davy182 - so did us just put a cap across the 2 e-stop wires at the BOB, or in the e-stop box itself?
    Also - what size capacitor?

    Thanks!

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    7063

    Re: Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    Quote Originally Posted by brianbonedoc View Post
    Davy182 - so did us just put a cap across the 2 e-stop wires at the BOB, or in the e-stop box itself?
    Also - what size capacitor?

    Thanks!
    The best place to put the caps is right at the BOB inputs.

    Regards,
    Ray L.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    204

    Re: Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    Attachment 282694 Here is what ultimately worked for my situation with a c32 board from cnc4pc.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3063

    Re: Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    Quote Originally Posted by SCzEngrgGroup View Post
    FWIW - Ferrite cores are completely useless in terms of preventing functional problems like you're seeing. They operate at extreme high frequencies - 10s to 100s of MHz - FAR beyond anything the logic can respond to. They are used to reduce EMI emissions only. If you suspect noise on an E-Stop or limit input, add a small capacitor between the signal and GND - 0.01uF or so. Ferrites will do no good at all.

    Regards,
    Ray L.
    Ray - I'm not disputing your conclusion, but I was having a devil of a time with very sporadic false limit switch triggers for quite a while with an early Tormach mill until they sent me a ferrite core to install on the parallel port cable between the PC and the controller. In the 5 or 6 years since I've never had another false switch trigger. What did the core fix?

    Mike

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    701

    Re: Ethernet Smooth Stepper Too Sensitive? Throwing Stop errors?

    Davy - thanks!!
    Is that .01uF as Ray suggested?

Page 1 of 2 12

Similar Threads

  1. G540 with an Ethernet Smooth Stepper set-up
    By GrandpawB in forum Gecko Drives
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-21-2015, 07:42 PM
  2. G540 with an Ethernet Smooth Stepper
    By dmauch in forum Gecko Drives
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-04-2015, 06:21 PM
  3. NEw case for the Eythernet Smooth Stepper and G540
    By dmauch in forum SmoothStepper Motion Control
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-02-2013, 08:50 PM
  4. ethernet smooth stepper
    By daniellyall in forum Mach Software (ArtSoft software)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-08-2013, 07:40 PM
  5. Smooth Stepper Ethernet Board - Mach3
    By mrpackethead in forum X3/SX3/G0619/G0463
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-09-2013, 02:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •