Thanks, I searched for a while to look for such a calculation but found nothing. I just sort of guessed based on the size of the stepper motor. Maybe I got lucky. ger21, I have my Y axis mounted to a plate and my x axis on four .75" diameter steel standoffs. The Y axis resonated much worse than my x axis before the damper. The Y axis is also belt driven. My Z axis is also belt driven and mounted on a less rigid weldment plate. It suffers no resonance at all. It drives a 10TPI acme though. Tighten the gib on the x axis and it has a large effect on removing the resonance. Tighten the gib on the y axis and there is absolutely no effect on resonance. There are just so many things that seem to play into the resonance picture. All I know right now is that the flywheel/damper kills the resonance dead cold in it's tracks on either axis. Take it off, and wow, instant nasty loud resonance is back. The rollers are noisy though. When I get the time I am going to try filling the roller pockets with a high viscosity liquid to dampen the roller action and see what effect that has. I realize most of the resonance removal is from inertia of the flywheel. There is no doubt about that. However what causes this resonance is best removed with a real damper. Just like the crankshaft on an engine tends to break over time without a harmonic damper. IMHO a real damper can only help and certainly will have no adverse effect over that of just a simple flywheel. Probably just boils down to how much work you want to invest in the part. I figure, heck with a cnc mill at my disposal I might as well make something a little nicer than just a simple flywheel. SteveExcellent job S_J_H! Did you use some kind of ratio to determine the sizes of your flywheel and rollers?