585,932 active members*
3,809 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    2

    Question Which Fastening Scheme Is Stronger?

    Hello. I am a software engineer by trade and a diesel mechanic by fate. As such, I apologize for asking what may likely be answerable by a first-year mechanical engineering student.

    I have a bus. The bus has support ribs:



    I wish to attach a second story to these support ribs, above the roof:



    Unlike the bare bolts in the photograph above, support columns I add for my second story will have between them and the bus wall (the support ribs) spacer columns. I am unable to determine the best fastening scheme involving these columns, with concern to strength and resilience to road conditions. Will you please help me? I propose two fastening schemes below. Scheme A uses two long bolts through concentric holes, while Scheme B uses four short bolts. Which scheme is stronger and more resilient?

    Attachment 366018

    Thank you for whatever thoughts you share.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    521

    Re: Which Fastening Scheme Is Stronger?

    Both achieve the same result although with considerable differences! The first is quick, easy and less critical on accuracy also simple fabrication although weather penetration could be an issue!
    The second is far more complicated requiring accurate drilling and tapping of both legs / body and spacer but could have decent weather proofing!
    Personally i'd go with the first!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    2

    Re: Which Fastening Scheme Is Stronger?

    Thank you for the reply. You answer interests me, as it is not what I was expecting.

    I do not plan on tapping, as I plan on using bolts (with non-threaded body sections bearing tube wall loads, likely with spacers on nut ends). In terms of structural integrity, however, would you say that Schemes A and B are more or less equal? Roads can be harsh. I expect a good deal of vertical shear.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    521

    Re: Which Fastening Scheme Is Stronger?

    Quote Originally Posted by TheBusDriver View Post
    Thank you for the reply. You answer interests me, as it is not what I was expecting.

    I do not plan on tapping, as I plan on using bolts (with non-threaded body sections bearing tube wall loads, likely with spacers on nut ends). In terms of structural integrity, however, would you say that Schemes A and B are more or less equal? Roads can be harsh. I expect a good deal of vertical shear.
    If you are concerned with rough roads / vertical shear then clamped surface area is your friend! In the bus pic above the small dowel like spacers provide little clamping area but if you used, say, a 3" sq plate welded to the leg and bolted through that and the body at 4 corners you have considerable loading capacity compared!

Similar Threads

  1. Fastening Rack to table?
    By country kid in forum CNC Plasma / Oxy Fuel Cutting Machines
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-31-2016, 09:52 PM
  2. Chip Pan is stronger than the vise!
    By RussMachine in forum Tormach Personal CNC Mill
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-02-2016, 05:37 PM
  3. Fastening Right Outer Skin
    By kemper45 in forum Momus Design CNC plans
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 06-01-2011, 10:18 PM
  4. Stronger motor
    By Kresimir in forum Mechanical Calculations/Engineering Design
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-31-2007, 06:59 AM
  5. Stronger cutting bits
    By studysession in forum Uncategorised MetalWorking Machines
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-01-2004, 12:27 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •