585,683 active members*
4,874 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2

    GD&T interpretation

    Hi all,

    New to the forum, but have used the site/others' responses frequently and it has been a ton of help. However, I do have a question to pose because there has been debate with colleagues and I would like some input from the machining world at large:

    We have been presented with a drawing for a part from a customer which gives a cylindricity callout of .07mm per 1 meter with no overall cylindricity. We machine everything in inches. The direct conversion is: .0027"/3.28 ft. The part to be machined is approximately 17" long. The question is this: With no overall cylindricity given, do I have a total of .0027" for this part since the part length falls within the 3.28 ft? OR is it necessary to convert the .0027" to a per inch callout and multiply by the overall length of 17" (which comes out to be .0008")?? Depending on which is technically correct, the cylindricity callout is either .0027" or .0008"; pretty big difference.

    Any input from you guys is greatly appreciated,

    Ed

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    803

    Re: GD&T interpretation

    We made parts for years without this GD&T stuff.
    The management came around with this "new" stuff and after studying, nothing i did changed.

    This is for inspection not machining.
    Just make parts within tolerance +/- or better,

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    2

    Re: GD&T interpretation

    First: Snarky or smart-ass replies are not appreciated. I am trying to gain a better understanding of machining/QC so don't respond at all if it is not constructive.
    Second: This doesn't answer my question. Even if this is strictly for inspection, inspection/QC will need to interpret these callouts. Depending on how the callout is read, the part will be bad or good. Again, if you only want to reminisce about the glory days before GD&T, please don't respond.


    Quote Originally Posted by bostosh View Post
    We made parts for years without this GD&T stuff.
    The management came around with this "new" stuff and after studying, nothing i did changed.

    This is for inspection not machining.
    Just make parts within tolerance +/- or better,

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    803

    Re: GD&T interpretation

    Please educate me then............. Really !

    As machinist, (during the last century)
    we /I could Jig Bore and Jig Grind to .0001 X,Y position and .0001 diameter.
    ( Precision tooling for production molds )
    On machines made in the 1940's or earlier. DeVlieg SIP Moore Wotan
    I did not have a reason to understand GDT i just made parts like always .
    Been doing this too long

Similar Threads

  1. FOR EVERYONE, INTERPRETATION WITH LIVE TOOLS "CITIZENS"
    By Ned-Dragon in forum CNC Swiss Screw Machines
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-30-2014, 07:06 AM
  2. Print interpretation
    By CFS in forum German
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-04-2010, 10:28 PM
  3. g code interpretation needed
    By 15mgtar in forum CNC (Mill / Lathe) Control Software (NC)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-21-2010, 03:02 PM
  4. 0M Macros - Interpretation
    By Zoner in forum Fanuc
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-11-2009, 03:10 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •