585,930 active members*
3,817 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
IndustryArena Forum > MetalWorking > MetalWork Discussion > Need help in chamfering
Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    7

    Need help in chamfering

    Hi,

    I have 316 material plate of 1/2 " inch thick and 18" inch long.. plate have 3 holes of 4" inch each ..i need to chamfer (45 degree) those holes for about 0.400 "inch in depth ..

    the problem is that the tool i am having has insert with cutting legth 0.275" inch ... i could think of doing it in 3D...

    but i appriciate any idea other than that...

    thank you

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3154
    Use 2.5D circular interpolation and 2 or 3 stepdowns.
    www.integratedmechanical.ca

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    2985
    you could also use a 1" drill mill, although not insertable, would get the job done.
    http://www.use-enco.com/CGI/INSRIT?P...MPXNO=16720058

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    251
    Do it in steps. Calculate the change in diameter relative to the vertical move. Program two, three or x passes to achieve the desired chamfer. Simple trig.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    12177
    Quote Originally Posted by ctate2000 View Post
    Do it in steps. Calculate the change in diameter relative to the vertical move. Program two, three or x passes to achieve the desired chamfer. Simple trig.
    You hardly even need to use trig. With 45degrees if you come up 0.1" then you go out 0.1":

    Interpolate down to 0.4" with the tool tip at a radius of 2.1", then down to 0.3" with a radius of 2.2", then 0.2" with a radius of 2.3" and 0.1" with a radius of 2.4".

    You could do it in fewer cuts but the tool width in contact would be larger and could possibly lead to chattering.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    103
    i could make you a 1IN 4 fl. drill mill.
    you will still need to interpolate. but the chamfer will be done i 1 pass
    the 4 flutes should help elimate the chatter. i can make it carbide or hss
    i can even pvd coat the tool to extend tool life.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4396
    Quote Originally Posted by Geof View Post
    You hardly even need to use trig. With 45degrees if you come up 0.1" then you go out 0.1":

    Interpolate down to 0.4" with the tool tip at a radius of 2.1", then down to 0.3" with a radius of 2.2", then 0.2" with a radius of 2.3" and 0.1" with a radius of 2.4".

    You could do it in fewer cuts but the tool width in contact would be larger and could possibly lead to chattering.
    Geof has a good idea with stepping down with a Mill Drill. You can get a 1/2 Diameter 4 Flute Carbide for around $47 dollars plus shipping and tax from Enco

    http://www.use-enco.com/CGI/INPDFF?P...PARTPG=INLMK32

    Cheers!!!!!!!!
    Toby D.
    "Imagination and Memory are but one thing, but for divers considerations have divers names"
    Schwarzwald

    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

    www.refractotech.com

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    51
    if you use an insertable cutter and you step up and over, make sure the 45° is right on the money. if not, you have mismatched lines in the chamfer.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4396
    Quote Originally Posted by HIRAH View Post
    if you use an insertable cutter and you step up and over, make sure the 45° is right on the money. if not, you have mismatched lines in the chamfer.
    Well he could prevent this by Programming a .05 overlap in the Z axis

    Cheers!!!!!:cheers:
    Toby D.
    "Imagination and Memory are but one thing, but for divers considerations have divers names"
    Schwarzwald

    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

    www.refractotech.com

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    12177
    Quote Originally Posted by tobyaxis View Post
    Well he could prevent this by Programming a .05 overlap in the Z axis

    Cheers!!!!!:cheers:
    Sorry to disappoint you Mr Axis this would not work. If the cutting edge is not at 45 degrees then you have to use trig and calculate the stepover/depth ratio.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4396
    Quote Originally Posted by Geof View Post
    Sorry to disappoint you Mr Axis this would not work. If the cutting edge is not at 45 degrees then you have to use trig and calculate the stepover/depth ratio.
    Ooops!!!!! I was refering to a 45 Degree Mill Drill or Indexable Insert tool. Thanks for making it clear for others, LOL, I sometimes forget that I should include more information in replies to questions.

    As a Note I have used CAD/CAM to create 45 Degree Chamfers with Ball End Mills. This is a good trick when you run short of Tool Pockets in the Magizine on a CNC Mill. Hence you have to have a Ball End Mill already in the machine and it's diameter has to be smaller than the hole being Chamfered.

    Cheers!!!!!!!:cheers:
    Toby D.
    "Imagination and Memory are but one thing, but for divers considerations have divers names"
    Schwarzwald

    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

    www.refractotech.com

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    12177
    Quote Originally Posted by tobyaxis View Post
    ...As a Note I have used CAD/CAM to create 45 Degree Chamfers with Ball End Mills. This is a good trick when you run short of Tool Pockets in the Magizine on a CNC Mill. Hence you have to have a Ball End Mill already in the machine and it's diameter has to be smaller than the hole being Chamfered.

    Cheers!!!!!!!:cheers:
    How long does it take to interpolate a chamfer this way? I would guess you can tolerate a stepover of about 0.005" so for a 0.4" deep chamfer that means at least 112 times around the circle (0.4 * 1.4 / 0.005 = 112). For the 3" holes mentioned in this thread your tool would have to travel around the 3" circle 112 times for a total distance of 3 * 3.14 * 112 = 1055inches. This is going to take a long time...or am I missing something?

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    51
    if the tool isn't at an almost perfect 45°, then changing the stepover won't help. the end result looks like shingles on a roof. 45s arent bad, but 30s suck. i usually program to the print, and add separate diameter offsets for each depth. total control without reprogramming.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    464

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    7

    thanks to everybody for your help and comments

    i really like your ideas ... but this time i finished the job with 3D...
    i am sure next time i can try TRIGNOMETRY thing ..
    thanks guys

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    4396
    Quote Originally Posted by Geof View Post
    How long does it take to interpolate a chamfer this way? I would guess you can tolerate a stepover of about 0.005" so for a 0.4" deep chamfer that means at least 112 times around the circle (0.4 * 1.4 / 0.005 = 112). For the 3" holes mentioned in this thread your tool would have to travel around the 3" circle 112 times for a total distance of 3 * 3.14 * 112 = 1055inches. This is going to take a long time...or am I missing something?
    You are correct. It takes a very long time Geof, but in a Crunch, you do what needs to be Done as you already know.

    "Imagination and memory are but one thing", "Which for diverse conciderations hath diverse names" Schwarzwald


    Quote Originally Posted by HIRAH View Post
    if the tool isn't at an almost perfect 45°, then changing the stepover won't help. the end result looks like shingles on a roof. 45s arent bad, but 30s suck. i usually program to the print, and add separate diameter offsets for each depth. total control without reprogramming.
    Not the Step Over, but the Step Down in the Z. You can use the same Program Coordinates XY and change the Cutter Comp for each step down. With a little math and a good machine you will be fine using a 45 degree Chamfering Tool.

    Quote Originally Posted by abcdef View Post
    i really like your ideas ... but this time i finished the job with 3D...
    i am sure next time i can try TRIGNOMETRY thing ..
    thanks guys
    Glad you got what you needed and hopefully you learned the many ways to Skin This Cat of yours, LOL.

    Cheers!!!!!!!:cheers:
    Toby D.
    "Imagination and Memory are but one thing, but for divers considerations have divers names"
    Schwarzwald

    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

    www.refractotech.com

Similar Threads

  1. Chamfering at diffrent heights?
    By turboboy in forum OneCNC
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-30-2006, 01:29 AM
  2. need help with auto radius and chamfering
    By dry run in forum G-Code Programing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-30-2005, 09:52 AM
  3. chamfering
    By Mortek in forum Uncategorised MetalWorking Machines
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-07-2004, 04:24 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •