585,908 active members*
3,812 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
IndustryArena Forum > Mechanical Engineering > Mechanical Calculations/Engineering Design > Dual 80/20 C Beam torsional rigidity question
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    15

    Dual 80/20 C Beam torsional rigidity question

    I have a openbuilds workbee and am looking to upgrade the torsional rigidity using two 80/20 Beam extrusions rather than the standard 1 beam.

    Question is should I put them back to back to give a 80/80 I beam or front to front to give a 80/80 tube picture of option attached.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    35538

    Re: Dual 80/20 C Beam torsional rigidity question

    I believe that the tube will be more rigid.
    Gerry

    UCCNC 2017 Screenset
    http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2017.html

    Mach3 2010 Screenset
    http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2010.html

    JointCAM - CNC Dovetails & Box Joints
    http://www.g-forcecnc.com/jointcam.html

    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    15

    Re: Dual 80/20 C Beam torsional rigidity question

    Quote Originally Posted by ger21 View Post
    I believe that the tube will be more rigid.
    Rarely is the loading purely torsional, consisting of a moment around the beam.

    However, if all one is seeking is increased torsional rigidity, then absolutely yes, the box beam will be best, exactly as ger21 says.

    Whatever most-resembles a circle, basically. The square box-beam would be closest of the options presented.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    15

    Re: Dual 80/20 C Beam torsional rigidity question

    The x axis is 1m long and most of the deflection I can feel is a moment around the beam and am worried the cutting forces will make this noticeable in chatter.

    the other option was to put a 80/20 on the back to make a smaller circle as per first pic ,as I am also worried about the width causing a issue with the longer bolts required across the gantry.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    15

    Re: Dual 80/20 C Beam torsional rigidity question

    Being a charter member of the "more is better" club, and a lifelong subscriber to "Overkill Monthly" I'm one to think that chatter is always present unless there's sufficient mass to dampen it.

    In fact, a profilometer will bear this out. Even what a machinist calls a "perfectly smooth cut" is simply chatter amplitude below immediate detection. But it's always there.

    I tend to believe there's not enough stiffness or strength that can be added to subdue chatter. Sooner or later the whole assembly will hit a harmonic. Mass dampens. Cast iron, granite, etc.

    Of course, this isn't always practical. But i thought i'd bring that up before you launched into a endless pursuit. Loading is probably fine. If your gantry is a box beam, then your weak spot will probably be your X axis motive components. But for chatter, adding stiffness works only to a point. After that, you'd be ahead with a big lump of clay to take out the vibes :-)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    15362

    Re: Dual 80/20 C Beam torsional rigidity question

    Quote Originally Posted by delco View Post
    The x axis is 1m long and most of the deflection I can feel is a moment around the beam and am worried the cutting forces will make this noticeable in chatter.

    the other option was to put a 80/20 on the back to make a smaller circle as per first pic ,as I am also worried about the width causing a issue with the longer bolts required across the gantry.
    This is the problem with extrusion, if you look at the end view you will see the weakest points all the links between the holes going through the extrusion all have a wall thickness, this is as strong as it can be, your bottom snip is the strongest way to mount it for torsional rigidity, add an aluminum plate between the 2 extrusions like 10mm or 3/8" and this will help but won't solve the problem that extrusion has
    Mactec54

Similar Threads

  1. Question regarding rigidity.
    By TheKnightFerrin in forum Chinese Machines
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-08-2015, 07:10 PM
  2. Rabbit 80 watt dual beam
    By Dennis Gipe in forum Laser Engraving / Cutting Machine General Topics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-15-2014, 04:16 PM
  3. Gantry rigidity question
    By mcv300 in forum Waterjet General Topics
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 07-14-2011, 03:11 AM
  4. Milling rigidity question
    By pminmo in forum MetalWork Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-30-2008, 07:29 PM
  5. Torsional strength of material
    By zoeper in forum Mechanical Calculations/Engineering Design
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-11-2006, 12:17 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •