585,997 active members*
5,135 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
IndustryArena Forum > CAM Software > ArtCam Pro > Paneling question start...finish
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    64

    Paneling question start...finish

    Need help...ok...this paneling thing has me a bit confused.
    If it returns home 0,0 after it cuts the first panel...then you pull your material through...how the heck do you make sure that the material is absolutly in the right place...if its off a centimeter..your cut will be off!

    Why doesnt artcam after cutting the first panel simply raise(z) the tool where it stops then you can pull the material through and lower the z to make its in the right spot and start from that point?

    sounds goofy to me to have it return to 0,0

    Im I doing something wrong?
    Does someone know a way of doing this?

    Thanks!!!!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    118
    You could just put in a line at the end to tell Z to move up whatever amount.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    634
    Most of the time it is advantageous to return to 0,0 - especially if you have 0,0 set to the center of the workpiece - and so it is the default.
    I suppose you could write or modify a postprocessor so your g-code did not do this if you were to need it often enough, but it is probably just easier to simply remove the offending line from the bottom of the generated g-code files in notepad or something.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    50
    Just FYI to all;

    The whole return home after cutting is something that is hardcoded in the program and from what I have been advised by development it was for safety reasons (well it could be argued several ways as to the theory behind this).

    Even if you remove the return home line in the .con post processor file please be aware that you will still end up with this X0 Y0 move.

    It has been requested a few times in the past that this restriction be removed so that the user can have more control over what happens at the end of a toolpath that has just been run. This request has been entered into the system as a wish and the development team are aware that some users would like this to be changed. That said its a bit of a double edged sword as far as if its removed then some users will not be happy that its gone and been changed.

    Ideally it would be nice to implement this request as a user definable setting so that some could have it on and other could have it off.

    I know this doesnt solve your issue but I wanted to add some additional comments about this topic so as to help everyone better understand what is going on with this.

    So currently your best option would be to manually edit the code and remove any unwanted return home moves that would exisit at the end of your code.

Similar Threads

  1. Newbie Question Where to Start?
    By electromech31 in forum Bridgeport / Hardinge Mills
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-09-2007, 03:38 AM
  2. Newbie question: what's causing this finish?
    By Involute in forum Syil Products
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-18-2007, 10:08 AM
  3. Single start vs double start ballscrew.
    By darik in forum Linear and Rotary Motion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-22-2007, 01:53 AM
  4. Bad finish
    By fadalman in forum Fadal
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-09-2006, 08:00 PM
  5. PCB routing from start to finish
    By Swede in forum CNC Machine Related Electronics
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-30-2004, 01:20 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •