585,906 active members*
3,949 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1332

    Mechanical Couplings Difference

    Don’t know if this is the right place to discuss couplings but I wonder is there a difference in using either of the ones shown in the attached picture and why?

    I have always used the type A to connect a stepper motor to a ball screw shaft on a typical 3 axis cnc and never had a problem but perhaps type B would be a better choice?

    Thanks
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Couplings.jpg  
    Nicolas

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    5717

    Re: Mechanical Couplings Difference

    I have never liked type A for transmitting much torque. They work great for driving encoders. It's a spring and thus would have some ''windup''. Also I don't like keyways and setscrews for couplings.

    Type B will transmit a lot of torque, and also is easy to disassemble when needed. The full around clamping action of the coupling on the shaft is more robust than a keyway and a setscrew.
    Jim Dawson
    Sandy, Oregon, USA

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1332

    Re: Mechanical Couplings Difference

    Many thanks for the education Jim, it makes sense and I will switch to type B.
    Nicolas

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    4370

    Re: Mechanical Couplings Difference

    Hi,
    I used A type on my original mini-mill. As Jim mentioned I did note a little 'lost motion' in the coupling as it would twist under load. The lost motion
    amounted to 4um and that compares to the natural resolution of 1um. I often considered replacing them, although really 4um is pretty damn good and probably
    better than the over-all accuracy of my machine.

    THEN....I had a crash. The steppers are coupled to 10:1 low lash planetary gearboxes and have a lot of torque, about 25Nm at a crash stall. I found that the type A coupling just shore
    off. I was very pleased, I was going to badly break or damage something and yet the coupling broke, cheaply and easily replaced. I came to realise that its like a mechanical 'fuse'.
    I decided to keep the type A couplers so that I did have a 'fuse' and would accept the minor loss of resolution. I used that machine for seven years and produced a mountain of good work
    with it.

    My new mill is much bigger and more powerful with servos direct coupled to the ballscrews. I could not tolerate the lost motion of the type A couplers but used twin disc couplings,
    they were pretty cheap, $60 for three of them. They have a 20mm nominal bore shaft size, and they work well. They will not shear off if I crash though......I haven't yet, 18 months and counting!

    Craig

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    1332

    Re: Mechanical Couplings Difference

    Thanks Craig, very inetersting
    Nicolas

Similar Threads

  1. Which Couplings??
    By southernexplore in forum Benchtop Machines
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-16-2011, 03:55 AM
  2. Couplings and Spindles
    By Xye in forum DIY CNC Router Table Machines
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-03-2011, 04:01 AM
  3. NEW Couplings
    By david12348 in forum News Announcements
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-16-2009, 05:06 AM
  4. question about couplings
    By 15mgtar in forum DIY CNC Router Table Machines
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-10-2009, 07:49 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •