[chrugel]

Hi,
I've just buldt three regular UHU controller and I use two of them for 24V motors and i want to use the third one for a 140V motor rated 1 A.
When i turn op the voltage to about 70V the snubber resistor on the output gives of quite a lot of smoke. With snubbere resistor i mean the 1k8 2W in series with a 100nf cap across the motor output terminals.
Can i remove this? what happens if i increas the resistor to 4k 4W?


I must say these controller are ingenious!! they are working great and it was actually quite easy to set the parameters. I was unable to get the system to oscillate so what i did was to use the go command and set the parameters so the overshoot became as small as possible. Is this the right way to do it?

best regards
chris

[chrugel]

This is what I'm going to try:
First Iæm going to try and replace the resistor with a higher value and higher power handlig capabilities. probably 3k4 6W since that what i have lying arround.
The next thing I'm going to try is to use the values from the HP UHU board which also includes an inductor. I wont be needing an inductor capable of handeling 20A, probably 5 A is sufficient. This will however require heavier modifications of the PCB.
My biggest concern when increasing the voltage is that the turn-off time on the transistors gets higher that than the delay and turn on time. This will cause severe power loss in the output stage. Guess i just have to try and see what happens.

regards
chris

[chrugel]

Without knowing what happend i just blew a UHU chip . . ...
The problem is that one of the encoder inputs seems to be irresponsive on the chip. I have three identical setups and if i move the chip to another board the error follows the chip.
Also the corresponding gate in the 74LS14 chip is blown together with 3 74ACT245 IC on the BOB.
And i have no idea how this could happen!!!!!!(chair)


Anyway i just replaced the capacitor with one on 22n instead of the 100n one with no effect on the heat in the resistor. Very strange!
I am going to try with a inductor there in series before the RC filter, hope that helps. I need to double the voltage .. .

regards
Chris

[chrugel]

Hello again!

Today i decided to do the math on the output on the high voltage UHU controller. I officially dont see the purpose of the original filtercomponents: 100nF and 1k8 this gives a -3dB point at about 1khz with a pwm signal at 20kHz you could probably just short the cap without any effect.

On the HP UHU controller the -3db point is at about 2.3MHz which is probably moore resonable.

I have decided to create a new filter on my controller with the following values:
Cap : 6 nF
Res: 25 Ohm
Ind: 5 uH

This will result in a -3db pint at one MHz wich i feel is moore resonable. I only need 3 amps of current capability in the inductor since my controller is limited to about 1,5 amps.

anyway thats all for now.
Feel free to comment. . . . .

regards
chris

[contactirfu]

Hi Chris - we left all the calculations to the experts - I feel difficult to comment - but I think it would be easier to get one of the HP UHU kits and build it.

just my 2c

[chrugel]

Hi Chris - we left all the calculations to the experts - I feel difficult to comment - but I think it would be easier to get one of the HP UHU kits and build it.

just my 2c

If i knew then, what i know now i probably would have done so. My problem now is that I probably doubled my budget and cant afford to spend much more on this. I probably got to eat cheap the couple of days just to get another UHU controller chip!

It has been stated the it should be possible with up to 150 v on the regular UHU with the IRFP260 transistors. These are rated 200V so 140 which I'm aiming for should not be a problem, i think . . .
I know that the reason for the HP UHU design was problems with handeling powers excess of 500w which I'm not even nearing. I have to try and make it works . . . .
I was hoping someone had done this before, running the regular UHU design with excess of 100V.

regards
Chris

[kreutz]

If i knew then, what i know now i probably would have done so. My problem now is that I probably doubled my budget and cant afford to spend much more on this. I probably got to eat cheap the couple of days just to get another UHU controller chip!

It has been stated the it should be possible with up to 150 v on the regular UHU with the IRFP260 transistors. These are rated 200V so 140 which I'm aiming for should not be a problem, i think . . .
I know that the reason for the HP UHU design was problems with handeling powers excess of 500w which I'm not even nearing. I have to try and make it works . . . .
I was hoping someone had done this before, running the regular UHU design with excess of 100V.

regards
Chris

The reason of the HP_UHU design was the cross-conduction above 70-80Volts independent of the load. The RLC filter at the output is not a low pass filter, it is a snubber.

[chrugel]

The reason of the HP_UHU design was the cross-conduction above 70-80Volts independent of the load. The RLC filter at the output is not a low pass filter, it is a snubber.

It's been quite a while since i had this at school so please be patient with me!
Isn't the function of the components in the RC or RLC filter at the output to limit the dv/dt going to the motor? in other words limit the higher frequencies towards the motor? Again is this not a lowpass filter that acts as a snubber??

cross-conductin, isn't the turn on time of a MOSFET dependent on the current thru it? Or have I got it all wrong?

kreutz, first of all I must say you have done a great job on the HP-UHU. I've been thru most of the posts concering HP-UHU, which is a lot, and you most certainly know what you are doing!
Is there no simple way for med to use the controller i have for this low power application? Do I really need the HP-UHU?

regards
Chris

[chrugel]

This will be my next move:

Replace the 1n4007 diodes in the gate network with HER105.

This beacase the HER105 is a super fast diode compared to the slow 1n4007, trr of 50nS compared to 2000nS

Replace the IRFP260 transistors with IRF640.

The gate capacitance of the 260 is 5200pF while that of the 640 is1300pF. The original UHU was designed for IRF540 which has a capacitance of 1700pF

Create a RLC snubber network on the output with these values:
R 25 Ohm
L 5uH
C 6nF

Since it seems to be nearly impossible to obtain this inductor at the time beeing this will be omitted and there will only be a RC snubber there for preliminary tests.
I dont think this should be any problem since the C is so small, of cause this will yeld higher dv/dt rates at the motor.
(frantically searching the web for diy inductor design formulas . . . )

Just to be clear, my goal is not a HP UHU controller just a high voltage version without the snubber heating problem and cross-conduction.
Ultimate goal: 150V 3 A

regards
chris

[contactirfu]

HI Chris - kindly share more of the calcs - some times I fail to understand - it was good that you could close with the older board for higher voltages.

also look at this thread - one of our friends - Ben - requires some help on his UHU project.

[denisas]

I used to improve the MG, TG, USG and MX series are high voltage resistors with axial leads. They are designed for high operating voltages (from units to tens of kilovolts) and are widely used as voltage dividers, absorbers in power plants, antenna equivalents, for spark extinguishing in high-voltage charging and discharge circuits, etc. Resistors of this type are resistant to significant short-term overloads ...