Originally Posted by
John Gamble
Dynoray
Please refer to my 3rd to last line.
"This particular issue was obviously not an original setup problem but related to vibration etc. during operation."
My machine has operated satisfactorily since February. I did notice that during a grooving operation, repeated 40 times over 20”, the groove was .002-.003 off at the end of the 20”. (Still well within advertised specs).
If others are as picky as I am and want near professional performance from a hobby machine, I would recommend:
1. Check the tightness of all axis.
2. Check backlash.
3. Calibrate all axis using a known accurate 4-6" bar and dial gauge. By adjusting the Motor Tuning "steps per" the accuracy can be improved from ".001-.002" to ".0002" approx. My machine came with the steps per on all axis set to 10160. I understand this is a calculated figure based on thread screw size. This will provide a basic level of accuracy.
Because my current project requires accuracy of < .002" (preferably .001") over 20", I invested 2-3 hours yesterday to see if I could exceed the published tolerances. By adjusting the steps per +/- 1, I was able to achieve the following repeatable tolerances.
Axis Steps Per Tolerance Distance
X 10152 .0000-1 4"
Y 10164 .0001-2 4"
Z 10159 .0001-2 4"
As my dial gauge only measures to .001 the forth digit is approximate.
Depending on axis tightness, a change of "1" in Steps per, is approx. .00025" (your mileage will vary)
While I am not privy to Navakon’s sales figures, if we assume 100’s of sales , it would appear that the silent majority is satisfied with the performance of their machines. I have and continue to speak to a number of them. May I respectfully suggest, that your issue with them, while it is by no means insignificant, is also not the norm. I do believe that your constant negative comments, particularly where they do not apply, will hinder not help your cause. By no means do I wish to trivialise your experience, you are obviously very dissatisfied. I do however believe you have stated your case quite frequently and emphatically.
In my original post, I specifically stated that this was NOT a setup problem. While I appreciate your frustration, I believe your comments in this case were not constructive and were uncalled for. Perhaps a separate post providing a periodic update of your machines status would better serve your purpose.
I and certainly other people on the board very much appreciate your knowledge and the suggestions you have posted to solve specific problems. I look forward to more of them in the future.
John