588,216 active members*
4,184 visitors online*
Register for free
Login Register
INDEX Forum
Gecko Drives > Running the revised G540
Results 1 to 5 of 5
\r\n\r\n
\r\n
\r\n \r\n
\r\n \r\n
\r\n dmauch\r\n \r\n
\r\n dmauch is offline\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n Registered\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
\r\n
\r\n \r\n
\r\n
\r\n
Join Date
Feb 2008
\r\n \r\n \r\n
Posts
243
\r\n \r\n
\r\n \r\n \r\n
\r\n \r\n
\r\n
\r\n\r\n
\r\n \r\n
\r\n \r\n

\r\n Running the revised G540\r\n

\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n I got an oportunity to test the revised g540 that has the trim pots mounted so that they can easily be adjusted without using a special insulated screw driver or tuning tool. The new trim pot is much easier to adjust without the danger of shorting something out.
\r\n
\r\nThe other revision Geckodrive made was adding a filter to the current sense lines. The reason for this mod was that the original concept of the g540 was to place the current setting resistor at the motor end connector. That way the motors could be connected to any cable and the current requirements would be met.
\r\nSome users were using inferior cable and this was casuing noise on the sense lines and thus the motors would run hotter than they should had they place the resistor at the G540 connector. But moving the resistor to the G540 end of the cable solved the problem but negated the benefit of the advantage of placing the resistor at the motor end.
\r\n
\r\n
\r\nI ran the prototype for about 8 hrs using a 48V power supply and various motors and various cable combinations. The motors all had their resistors at the motor side of the connector.
\r\nThe new filtering worked well even on a cheap inferior cable. I observed a 28% reduction is motor temerature. On good cables with ferrite beads potteded into the cable the improvemt was a heathy 10.5%
\r\n
\r\nA surprising side benefit that I noted was that running the same program resulted with the prototype case termperature of 112F. With and older D10 G540 the case termperature was 129F. I can only surmise that the G540 was running cooler because the motors were drawing less current due to the better filtering. In this case I blocked the air from my enclosures fan . Ambient terperature was 69F.
\r\nDan Mauch
\r\nwww.camtronics-cmnc.com\r\n
\r\n
\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n\r\n
\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Reply With Quote Reply With Quote \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
\r\n
\r\n
\r\n\r\n'; pd[963687] = '\r\n
  • \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n #2\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n\r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n doorknob\r\n \r\n
    \r\n doorknob is offline\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n Gold Member\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    \r\n \r\n \r\n
    Posts
    2141
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n\r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n Is there some external marking to distinguish the revised G540 from the earlier ones?
    \r\n
    \r\nHow does the pot adjustment look from the outside (as opposed to the earlier setup)?\r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n\r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Reply With Quote Reply With Quote \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
  • \r\n'; pd[963695] = '\r\n
  • \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n #3\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n\r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n dmauch\r\n \r\n
    \r\n dmauch is offline\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n Registered\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    \r\n \r\n \r\n
    Posts
    243
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n\r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n The one I tested was marked prototype. They are not out for sale yet.
    \r\nThe trim pot holes are in the same place but the pot itself is maybe a 1/4" blow the hole. Very easy to see.
    \r\n
    \r\nDan
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n Quote Originally Posted by doorknob\r\n View Post\r\n
    \r\n
    Is there some external marking to distinguish the revised G540 from the earlier ones?
    \r\n
    \r\nHow does the pot adjustment look from the outside (as opposed to the earlier setup)?
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n\r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Reply With Quote Reply With Quote \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
  • \r\n'; pd[965422] = '\r\n
  • \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n #4\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n\r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n RPCElectronics\r\n \r\n
    \r\n RPCElectronics is offline\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n Registered\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    \r\n \r\n \r\n
    Posts
    167
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n\r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n That sucks. I just bought one direct from them for the full $299 price. I wish I would have known to wait on the newer version. I don\'t even need mine yet, I was just trying to gather up all of the parts. I am at least a few months away from even powering my G540 up.
    \n
    \nI purchased the NEMA 23\'s on their site and was surprised that the wires were only about a foot long, so I planned to just put the DB9\'s on them, with the current setting resistor inside of that hood. I then brought some medium gauge ~18AWG multi-conductor cable from work to make three high-quality extension cables of about 8 feet each.\r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n\r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    Jason
    \r\nRPC Electronics, LLC - www.rpc-electronics.com
    \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Reply With Quote Reply With Quote \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
  • \r\n'; pd[965463] = '\r\n
  • \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n #5\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n\r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n dmauch\r\n \r\n
    \r\n dmauch is offline\r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n Registered\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    \r\n \r\n \r\n
    Posts
    243
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n\r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n It could be a couple months till they are availble. I would put the resistor in the connector on the G540 side of the cable.
    \r\nIn my testing I found that on some motors it didn\'t have that much different if you used a good cable. The difference was only 10F
    \r\n
    \r\nDan Mauch
    \r\nCamtronics, inc. -' + '- CNC with Dan Mauch
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n Quote Originally Posted by RPCElectronics\r\n View Post\r\n
    \r\n
    That sucks. I just bought one direct from them for the full $299 price. I wish I would have known to wait on the newer version. I don\'t even need mine yet, I was just trying to gather up all of the parts. I am at least a few months away from even powering my G540 up.
    \r\n
    \r\nI purchased the NEMA 23\'s on their site and was surprised that the wires were only about a foot long, so I planned to just put the DB9\'s on them, with the current setting resistor inside of that hood. I then brought some medium gauge ~18AWG multi-conductor cable from work to make three high-quality extension cables of about 8 feet each.
    \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n\r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n Reply With Quote Reply With Quote \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
    \r\n
  • \r\n'; // next/previous post info pn[963658] = "965463,963687"; pn[0] = ",963658"; pn[963687] = "963658,963695"; pn[963695] = "963687,965422"; pn[965422] = "963695,965463"; pn[965463] = "965422,963658"; // cached usernames pu[0] = guestphrase; pu[168063] = "dmauch"; pu[252527] = "doorknob"; pu[227719] = "RPCElectronics"; // -->

    Threaded View

    1. #1
      Join Date
      Feb 2008
      Posts
      243

      Running the revised G540

      I got an oportunity to test the revised g540 that has the trim pots mounted so that they can easily be adjusted without using a special insulated screw driver or tuning tool. The new trim pot is much easier to adjust without the danger of shorting something out.

      The other revision Geckodrive made was adding a filter to the current sense lines. The reason for this mod was that the original concept of the g540 was to place the current setting resistor at the motor end connector. That way the motors could be connected to any cable and the current requirements would be met.
      Some users were using inferior cable and this was casuing noise on the sense lines and thus the motors would run hotter than they should had they place the resistor at the G540 connector. But moving the resistor to the G540 end of the cable solved the problem but negated the benefit of the advantage of placing the resistor at the motor end.


      I ran the prototype for about 8 hrs using a 48V power supply and various motors and various cable combinations. The motors all had their resistors at the motor side of the connector.
      The new filtering worked well even on a cheap inferior cable. I observed a 28% reduction is motor temerature. On good cables with ferrite beads potteded into the cable the improvemt was a heathy 10.5%

      A surprising side benefit that I noted was that running the same program resulted with the prototype case termperature of 112F. With and older D10 G540 the case termperature was 129F. I can only surmise that the G540 was running cooler because the motors were drawing less current due to the better filtering. In this case I blocked the air from my enclosures fan . Ambient terperature was 69F.
      Dan Mauch
      www.camtronics-cmnc.com

    Similar Threads

    1. Looking for software running g540
      By punkinbeck in forum Plasma, EDM / Other similar machine Project Log
      Replies: 3
      Last Post: 07-08-2011, 08:53 PM
    2. Revised design model
      By jzurek in forum DIY CNC Router Table Machines
      Replies: 22
      Last Post: 05-03-2011, 03:08 PM
    3. Replies: 1
      Last Post: 05-05-2009, 08:11 PM
    4. Comments anyone please.......(revised)
      By marcusb in forum Uncategorised MetalWorking Machines
      Replies: 7
      Last Post: 02-17-2007, 05:34 PM
    5. Revised Website
      By Hack in forum News Announcements
      Replies: 2
      Last Post: 03-31-2006, 02:37 AM

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may not post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •