Hi,
I agree.
Just as a sanity check try these numbers. For uncoated carbide tools in mild steel you need a surface speed of 100m/min. You can go slower (and get greater tool life) and you can go faster
but with a dramatic reduction in tool life. So I suggest you use 100m/min as a ballpark target surface speed. Drop to 50m/min to 75m/min for stainless or tough steels like 4340.
for a 6mm diameter tool:
R=100 / ( 0.006 x pi)
=5306rpm
for a 12mm diameter tool
R=100 / (0.012 x pi)
=2653rpm
So if your spindle is 24000rpm (rated) then you'll need a 4.5 : 1 reduction. If you wish to get right down to 2653rpm while having your spindle still at 24000rpm and its most powerful condition,
then you'll need a 9 : 1 reduction.
To be honest a belt reduction is limited to about 3 : 1 , so you'd need two stages of reduction.
Second issue is that your spindle was never designed to take large radial loads and the armature will bend like a banana with the side load you need to apply to hold the belt in tension.
The high speed low torque spindles are NOT well suited to this kind of service. That is not to say its impossible but there may be pit-falls that you did not anticipate.
I for many years used an air cooled 800W 24000rpm spindle. I would slow it to 12000 rpm with 3mm tools (148m/min) to cut steel. It was still too fast, and I'd get
about 1hour to two hours tool life in mild steel WITH plenty of flood coolant. This was a barely acceptable compromise. I did use it occasionally in steel when I couldn't be bothered swapping
the spindle, but not that often. It is fair to say my 800W 24000rpm spindle is NOT for steel.....it was brilliant for other things, just not steel.
What I did is build a second spindle that I could swap to when doing steel and stainless. It was based on a second hand 1.8kW (S1), 6.1Nm(S1), 18Nm (overload), 3500rpm(rated) servo.
I was able to buy the servo and drive reasonably cheap (approx $600USD) here in New Zealand. Cost another $300USD to get the right cables, and another $140USD to get the set-up and tuning software.
So it did not work out quite as cheap as I thought, but still not too bad.
I direct coupled that to a RegoFix cylindrical ER25 tool holder in NSK matched P4 bearings. I made my own housing, and while not perfect it goes bloody well. I used it on and off
for six years, and still have it.
I could run a 12mm tool in mild steel for hours at a time without the servo overheating, sure it gets warm, even hot to touch, but not overheat. I should probably have mounted a small PC fan to keep it
cool, but I never got around to it. The point being that modern AC servos are very power dense and can deliver good performance where an asynchronous motor does not. An asynchronous motor just does not have
the overload torque a AC servo or synchronous AC motor, also call BLDC.
Moe recently I have bought a new spindle. 3.5kW (S1), 3.4Nm(S1), 10krpm(rated), 40krpm(max), 400V with an HSH32E tool interface. It brilliant. Ok at 3.4Nm its still no
great shakes in steel, but I run 6mm and 8mm tools (5306rpm and 3979rpm respectively) with good authority. It is water cooled, and I have a refrigerated chiller keeping the circulating water cool,
and I can run for hours at a time in steel.
My old servo spindle has more torque, but I am very impressed and delighted what my new spindle can do. I cannot swap it out nearly as easily as I used to so I have not used the old servo spindle since
I installed this new spindle.
I paid $2000USD for this spindle, which included shipping to New Zealand and ten HSK32 ER20 tool holders. By the time I got a decent (11kW Delta MS300 High Speed) VFD, the required pneumatics
for the tool change, made my own interlock and monitoring board, had a chiller made for keeping the coolant circulation in check, it cost closer to $4500USD. The tool change feature alone
has more than paid for itself. Its transformed my CNCing, but also having (fair) torque at low speeds, I run it down to 2000rpm is also extremely useful. I now have a spindle that 'does everything'.
OK ......its no steel-hog....but it does OK.
These spindles, several kW, with tool change, are about as cheap as ever I've seen them. I believe China is in a recession and these spindles are being priced to sell in fact under-priced to sell.
If you are ever going to get a spindle like this then now is the time. I suspect the Trump Tariff war is going to wreck the market for these things soon.
Seems to me your choices are:
1) Use your existing spindle at as slower speed as you dare, say 9000rpm and realise that you are in effect limited to 3mm and smaller tools. Its slow but it does work.
2) Use either a servo or a BLDC motor (synchronous AC motor) made for spindle service.Both types offer excellent torque. The BLDC types offer good low down torque but also surprisingly good top speed
by virtue of 'Field Weakening', a property employed by the dedicated drive to gain best flexibility of performance for these motors. This is an example:
https://www.ebay.com/itm/26533830179...Bk9SR_yAgeeXZQ
Such a motor would drive a belt driven spindle or be direct coupled to a spindle, rather more like mine as pictured. This one is 3.7kW (S1) and 24Nm(S1).....so it will have plenty of grunt for any steel
job you want to do. Just be aware that you need to match it with a drive, and they can as much or even more than the motor. Don't buy a motor and then try to find a drive, you should buy as a matched
pair or risk wasting your money.
3) Buy a larger asynchronous spindle, in the 3kW to 7kW class, and look for low speed/high torque capability....something along the lines of the one I bought as pictured. If you choose well you'll get
a spindle that can do 24000rpm, but can also get down to say 3000rpm with fair torque.....ideally 3Nm-4Nm. Not great for steel, but not too bad either. This is the one I want:
https://www.nakanishi-jaeger.com/en/f-line/10408017
It is 18kW(S1), 24000rpm, 13Nm(S1) with 80 bar through spindle coolant and an HSK63F/HSK50E tool interface. Its 23,000 Euro, so I have to save up!!! I know...I know....pure spindle porn!
4) Use your existing 1.5kW spindle through a reduction, either belt or gearbox. I think this is a problematic solution at best, but is your choice.
Craig