Thomas,
On the final pass change the Approach Style to Radial and enter an appropriate ramp on/off radius. This method will also provide better results on this type of part.
OneCNC-USA
Thomas,
On the final pass change the Approach Style to Radial and enter an appropriate ramp on/off radius. This method will also provide better results on this type of part.
OneCNC-USA
(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
With OneCNC-USA suggestion I see what you are talking about now.
Yes it did fine in simulate when I used the radius but I do not like the plunge it has to do into 1/2" of uncut stock to get to the proper depth before the radius in.Originally Posted by OneCNC
Why doesn't follow boundary ramp in work?
Thomas
What radius are you using ?
Ken
Thomas,
See this file..you can use radial approach. If you sketch a start point, you can force it to plunge into an area that does not have stock left..
Ramp boundary is really not for a part like this..as it ramps to depth and then returns to the start of the ramp..so what ever was under the "ramp area" does not get cut...
(Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)
OK, thanks, I will try this when I get home.Originally Posted by wms
One more thing. When the program is finished with the first flat (the pockets) it goes out to the boundary of the second flat (perimeter of the part) and continues to machine. The problem is that from the first flat to the second in x/y there is stock material that is full thickness. The 1/2" bit plunges into over a half inch of stock. Is there a way around this?
Thomas