Thank you for sharing your concerns. I agree that 123 blocks lined up are probably not 100% accurate, especially given that I am not using the $100+/pair high precision blocks. And no, I did not make unrealistic assumptions about accuracy. I knew going in that I was not going to get perfection, but believed that using the blocks was likely more accurate than using a steel rule and some sort of pointy object mounted in the spindle, or other alternatives. Wringing was not in the cards, even if the blocks I used could be wrung. There were to many of them. In any event, the method I used was certainly more accurate than using a tape measure, which I seen others use. FWIW, I have an I-Gaging 36" steel straight edge with rule, but elected to use the 123 blocks. I thought I would get more accuracy with the blocks. With a rule, assuming it is very precise, you have to get both zero and the end length dead on. I have no confidence that I could do it well, even with a magnifying glass. I am not capable of making visual judgments in thousands of an inch.
I could have also used a dial indicator and measured over an inch distance. It thought about and rejected it. One problem with the method is the accuracy of the indicator. They are commonly rated at +/- .001", which can introduce a good deal of error over longer distances. Certificates on some of the expensive ones show an error in the .001" range at 2 dial revolutions. At 36", you could be off as much as .036". A huge error. It gets even more complicated, because the indicator's spring pressure can and will move the holding arm by around .0002" at 1/2 inch of movement - even for good brands of arms, like Noga. Of course, as spring tension increases. as would be the case with a 1" measurement, so will the holding arm movement. Assuming .0002" of movement, you would be off .0072" at 36", exclusive of any error in the dial indicator itself.
As I believe is evident, I gave all this a lot of thought. At the end of the day, I had to pick what I hoped was the the best of imperfect choices.
Having identified potential inaccuracies, which I truly appreciate, do you have any suggestions about how I might do it more accurately? As much thought as I gave to the process, I could have overlooked something obvious, or not so obvious. If you have a CNC, how did you do it?
Thank you,
Gary