587,787 active members*
2,936 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    232
    HawkJET.

    Which issues of Home Shop Machinist have the articles that you referred to?

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    336
    Quote Originally Posted by kanton View Post
    Which issues of Home Shop Machinist have the articles that you referred to?
    HSM Sep - Oct 2004
    HSM Nov - Dec 2004
    HSM Jan - Feb 2004

    You can get pdf copies of them at:

    http://www.mgertech.com/cnc/cncmachining.htm

    Under "-BRIDGEPORT CNC RECLAIM"
    "Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." Antoine de Saint-Exupery (1900 - 1944)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    1759
    Hello. Don't be afraid!

    Depends on what you are looking at doing.. Are you planning on just using a printer port? Or 2 or 4? There are many ready made Bobs that work great with emc. (I don't know of any as I make my own when needed) You will be limited by step speed and such. Do you know what step frequency you are going to require? Most computers running emc can do anywhere from 20-40khz+.

    there are also quite a few inexpensive interfaces that give you a lot more abillity - like Pico, mesa and such. They move the step generation/ encoder counting to the hardware so emc's load is reduced.

    http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/emc...orted_Hardware

    (both mesa and pico are very involved in emc)

    Also - as far as modbus - emc seems to support it through the classic ladder interface - but I have not played with it.
    http://www.linuxcnc.org/docs/2.3/htm...der.html#r1_10

    Classic ladder is integrated within emc allowing you to do ladder logic also.
    http://www.linuxcnc.org/docs/2.3/htm...ic_ladder.html

    read read read
    http://www.linuxcnc.org/docs/2.3/html/

    Are you planning also to be able to rigid tap?

    sam

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    336
    Quote Originally Posted by samco View Post
    Are you planning on just using a printer port? Or 2 or 4?
    Probably two at the most. I don't know what is available from just one.

    Quote Originally Posted by samco View Post
    There are many ready made Bobs that work great with emc. (I don't know of any as I make my own when needed)
    I'm interested in what you have done. Do you have any build threads for building BOBs? Do you opto isolate? Buffer? Use relays? I'm interested in what you have done.

    Quote Originally Posted by samco View Post
    You will be limited by step speed and such. Do you know what step frequency you are going to require? Most computers running emc can do anywhere from 20-40khz+.
    I haven't yet experimented with step resolution so I don't know for sure. I suspect 20-40khz should do it.

    Quote Originally Posted by samco View Post
    there are also quite a few inexpensive interfaces that give you a lot more abillity - like Pico, mesa and such. They move the step generation/ encoder counting to the hardware so emc's load is reduced.
    I quickly glanced at one of these. They look very cool! I'll be looking into it further.

    Quote Originally Posted by samco View Post
    Are you planning also to be able to rigid tap?
    No.
    "Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." Antoine de Saint-Exupery (1900 - 1944)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2502
    Here is an introduction to Breakout Boards:

    http://www.cnccookbook.com/CCBreakoutBoards.htm

    The main reason to use a ModIO is the limit on the number of I/O lines available with a parallel port. If you can get by with what's available, you won't need one. You can also use a 2nd parallel port to increase the number of lines.

    Alternatively, you could use a motion controller, like a Smoothstepper. Not familiar with what EMC supports or doesn't there.

    Cheers,

    BW
    Try G-Wizard Machinist's Calculator for free:
    http://www.cnccookbook.com/CCGWizard.html

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    336
    Quote Originally Posted by BobWarfield View Post
    The main reason to use a ModIO is the limit on the number of I/O lines available with a parallel port. If you can get by with what's available, you won't need one. You can also use a 2nd parallel port to increase the number of lines.
    This is basically what I had assumed. I guess I don't have the 'big picture' with I/O in general. What do people generally use? Does a control console with keypad and various control switches take the I/O from the parallel port? Does a second parallel port add a significant amount of capability? Is a second parallel port easy to get? (it has been years since I had to deal with printer port cards and parallel has given way to USB....)

    Quote Originally Posted by BobWarfield View Post
    Alternatively, you could use a motion controller, like a Smoothstepper. Not familiar with what EMC supports or doesn't there.
    I understand Mach3 is the only software to support SS.
    "Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." Antoine de Saint-Exupery (1900 - 1944)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2502
    The real bottleneck is inputs. With parallel, you generally get 11 outputs and 5 inputs. You can go through those inputs in a hurry by the time you've got home/limit switches and now want a bunch of control panel functions.

    Another approach is to use a key simulator. This is a little box you can plug between your keyboard and your control panel. It adds a bunch of inputs. You close and input and it sends a keycode as though you had typed it on the keyboard. So, for example, you could use a game controller joystick to simulate pressing the arrow keys to jog.

    This works pretty well, so long as the key pulses don't come to close together. You could do a lot of pushbuttons on a panel that way, for example.

    So your choices would be one or more of:

    - Add an additional parallel port card, pick up 11 outputs and 5 more inputs. I'd probably only do this if I wanted to run my MPG this way.

    - Add a key emulator. Probably the cheapest and easiest way to get a bunch of buttons going on a panel.

    - Use a touch screen. That works great for buttons too!

    - Use a ModIO. BTW, Homann makes a real cool pendant that works via ModIO that I am building for my mill.

    - Use a motion controller that has a lot of inputs like a Smoothstepper.

    The input problem is what got me to buy an original GRex. It's a nuisance. These days I am inclined to go with a touch panel and a ModIO-based pendant with an MPG. Easy to set up and lots of bang for the buck.

    Cheers,

    BW
    Try G-Wizard Machinist's Calculator for free:
    http://www.cnccookbook.com/CCGWizard.html

Similar Threads

  1. Bridgeport TNC150 to TNC151A upgrade
    By UK Dave in forum Bridgeport / Hardinge Mills
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-09-2012, 09:53 AM
  2. CNC Bridgeport upgrade
    By candylyn in forum Bridgeport / Hardinge Mills
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-11-2009, 08:51 PM
  3. Bridgeport Upgrade
    By jaztau in forum Bridgeport / Hardinge Mills
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-13-2008, 03:54 PM
  4. Need advise on BP series 1 Boss CNC upgrade
    By lkasdorf in forum Bridgeport / Hardinge Mills
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-08-2007, 11:53 PM
  5. Bridgeport EZ Trak control upgrade.
    By mailloux in forum Bridgeport / Hardinge Mills
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-14-2006, 02:53 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •