588,676 active members*
6,253 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
Page 1 of 2 12
Results 1 to 20 of 25
  1. #1

    Cool Taking my Bridgeport Series I to CNC

    What a great bunch of Very knowledgeable people here!

    I am shopping around to take my Bridgeport series 1 knee mill to CNC
    I have looked into various retro fit kits.
    I have a wife & 3 kids so $$ is limited.

    My question is if anyone here has suggestions and experience on retro fitting their Bridgeport to a 4 axis for under $6,000.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1543
    I'd suggest you start by looking at software packages. Look at Mach 3 - low cost, Centroid/Ajaz - mid cost, Camsoft - hi cost. (I'm a camsoft guy) Mach3 may meet your needs, but you do get what you pay for.

    Do You have servos or steppers on your X,Y,Z axis? What sort of device do you have for the fourth axis? A few series 1 machines had tool changers, does yours?

    If you do the work yourself, you should easily stay in your budget.

    Karl

  3. #3

    Taking my Bridgeport to CNC

    Thanks Karl_T

    Well I was previously looking at
    http://www.cncmasters.com/CNC%20Supr...ofit%20Kit.htm
    They have a full kit with software and 4th axit for around 7 grand but I am hoping to do better price wise. I am getting Bobcad V20 , it should be here today.
    I will check into Mach 3
    from what I have read, servos are better than steppers but a bit more costly, is this correct?
    I would like to put a tool changer on it but I dont know if this is possible.

    Tony

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    1543
    I misundstood, I thought you had a machine that was already a CNC. It may be cheaper to just find a Series 1 with a dead BOSS control so you get all the ball screws servo/stepper motors limit switches etc. already on the machine.

    If you're already committed to retro this machine, I'd shop Ebay and other used outlets for servos and ball screws. You'll also need limit switches, two or three per axis. I'd suggest a VFD to drive the spindle.

    The kit you found looks fine. You'll spend more $ and less time. Seems like it allways a choice of time or $. I probably wouldn't go with that software.

    Mach 3 is very popular software for what you're doing. Lots of help here and on the yahoo Mach NG.



    Karl

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    293
    Tony, if you have the machine you should be able to do it for $6K. I really need to add up all my costs so we have at least one bench mark. I think I'm at $8K including the purchase of the machine.

    Um...I'm almost done with mine. I have the whole thing posted here in my conversion blog. Not saying that I have the way to go, just a way to go.

    Servos -v- steppers. The debate rages on. Steppers seem to be the defacto standard for the hobby group and a lot of commercial machines. But a lot of commericial machines are using servos or steppers with encoders. The realy key here is not the motor, it's the closed loop feedback. People put encoders on steppers too.

    Steppers can be made to behave more precisely in the first place. Thus no need for an encoder to ensure position. A servo is just a pretty normal DC motor with a shaft encoder on it. So it has to have drive electronics to complete the feed back loop.

    Couple of recent developments.

    Rogers Machine has worked with Jim Cullins to come up with an interface board to act as a DRO AND communicate with Mach3. Rogers wrote some software that allows Mach to be tripped into e-stop when the servos get behind. This is an improvement since the only way for that to happen now that is kinda of the shelf is to have the servo driver trip an e-stop. Then you are at the mercy of the servo driver. I am using Gecko G320s. They fault at 128 steps out. A circuit has to be built to trip the software e-stop via some kind of communication with the PC. Many of the break out boards have a pin or two for this kinda stuff.

    Depending on you ratios and encoders, 128 steps could be a lot of distance. On my machine it's .004. I can live with that but I'd like it to be .001. Then I get into a higher drive ratio. Then I need a two stage belt drive and the complexity goes up.

    So an electronic solution is really attractive.

    Gecko has something called the GRex. It is a little computer really. It takes USB from the PC and hooks up to the servo motors and the encoders. Mach4 will have support for it later this year. It should, if I'm reading the tea leaves, allow some real feedback that will allow the servo motor speed to adjust as steps begin to get off. It will eventually fault out but this should make the servos darned near unstallable. I believe Grex also supports steppers and Gecko has been working on the unstallable stepper for a while. They do this by putting and encoder on the stepper.

    This is really interesting to me because then the stepper is essentially a servo.

    Then there is the whole EMC camp. This is the Linux based controller. Jon Elson, Pico-Systems, has some hardware that allows EMC to behave in a proportional manner as I described. EMC has a great following. It is free. It is a little harder to install.

    In my opinion if you don't close the loop to the computer you are running open loop, so why bother with the servo? I didn't figure this out until recently. I'm waiting for Mach4 to make a decision. The Grex is additional cost.

    Having said that, my motors are tuned such that I have not had this kind of a problem. I crashed a tool once and that screwed the datums up, but I'm not sure anything can prevent that. So, I could just as well be running steppers right now.

    The smart thing to do now might be to get steppers that at least have the encoder shaft on them. Then you can upgrade to a closed loop system if you feel you need it.

    That's my relatively non-technical explanation of what's going on.

    Best,
    -jd
    John Delaney
    www.rwicooking.com

  6. #6

    Smile Bridgeport retrofit

    Wow
    What alot of good advice!
    Thank you.
    I do already have the machine, so I will need to retro fit it.
    JD, you have some nice products.
    form reading what is on this site, it looks like I will be tearing my machine apart and rebuilding it with and replacing some parts.
    I have time, I wont have my cnc up and running until about August.
    I should do it right the first time.
    Thanks again for your advice

    Tony

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    293
    Thanks very much!

    Yeah, might be a good idea. I am going to have to tear down my 2J Head sooner than later. I think it's the clutch. Anyway, we'll see what evil lurks in there when I get to it.

    I look at mxtras rig and drool over all the pretty blue paint. Very nice job he's doing there.

    -jd
    John Delaney
    www.rwicooking.com

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    3319
    Please, somebody, post a link someplace so that JD's explanation above can be easily referred to.

    It is a clear concise and non-technobabble sumary that should be required reading for any budding DIY CNC retrofitter.

    I admittedly have a preference for servos. Why??? They do have feedback already designed/built into the system. It seems to me that addition of encoders et al to steppers is a way to try to do a back door conversoin of a stepper into a servo. Besides, my neigbor's HAAS has them and if it cost that much, it has to be better. 8-)

    Steppers are a bit more economical and, if driven properly by well developed code/drivers, you should not have step loss problems. The thing to remember is that TIME becomes the factor.

    Ultimately, can the stepper respond as fast as you plan to send the code??? If not, lost steps and unsatisfactory results will occur.

    Remember: It is easy to get the electronics to respond at some gigamegahexahertz rate. Electro mechanical stuff is plagued with inductance, capacitance, slop, backlash and friction and F=MA issues that the computer, sadly, easily ignores...

    These ultimately cause more problems than a "you should'a used a servo" or "darn overpiced servo didn't work any better than the stepper I just sold" moment....

    Even with servos (well tuned and maintained) we still slow things down when we're trying for optimum accuracy.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    481
    hi guys

    I'm in the same situation as TONY_HUGHES ,

    not meaning to hijack this thread

    nor did i want to ask the same question

    and start another thread and consume site space

    any help would be appreciated i would like to convert a mill to cnc to

    cheers

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    293

    At the risk of blatant self promotion....

    Here's the link to my thread.

    http://www.cnczone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8749

    I have been at this for like 2.5 years. Many interuptions and a lot of learning. Still this is not easy and it is not simple. But it can be done. I feel like I knew nothing about being a machinist when I started. I now feel like I know enough to hold my own around here.

    There is NO easy guide. I think my thread is one of the most complete and detailed threads available. It is not perfect. Is is not a total newbie's guide either. But it is pretty detailed and very specific on many things.

    Someday I want to make it better, but time is the problem. Doing the best I can.

    Here are the basics steps if you don't know them:

    You need a mill. I suggest getting a mill that is already CNC capable but that's not where this thread is going.

    Next you are going to need the following major components:

    Servo or Stepper motors
    A computer
    Controller software (Mach3 / TurboCNC / EMC...etc.)
    Parallel port break out / interface (Sound Logic & others)
    Motor Drivers (Gecko, Xylotex & many others)
    OBTW - There is a great thread on this site about a DIY servo driver
    A control / electrical cabinet
    Unregulated DC power supply for the motors
    VFD (Variable frequency drive to run the main motor on your single phase 220 dryer or stove circuit, in most cases)
    Misc wire, relays, switches, and terminal blocks
    Several pounds of nuts & bolts
    Several pounds of alum. & steel.
    CAD software
    Maybe CAM software. A lot of stuff can be "hand" coded.

    I would approach it like this:

    1.) Get the X-Y drives built first
    2.) Get them running under CNC control
    3.) Make the Z drive using the two axis machine you have now
    4.) Finish up the limit switches & other items that are needed but not bare minimums.

    Does that help? Is that more of what you were looking for. It's hard to figure out where everyone is starting from.

    -jd
    John Delaney
    www.rwicooking.com

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    334
    Hi Guy's,
    JD's thread is very informative and a must see! Also check out Roland Friestad's series of articles in Home Shop Machinist Magazine. They can also be viewed at his site www.cardinaleng.com.
    I have been retrofitting both a Bridgeport 2 J and a Boss 4 and the Boss was much less costly because the 3 axis hardware is already installed and the only serious work is stripping the "old"
    electronics and this is detailed very precisely in the HSM articles. You can do the whole retrofit
    for under $1000. On the 2J The ground Ball Screw kit from Hiwin cost me that much. I paid $1500
    for the Boss on EBay because their resale value seems to be less than the 2J. The BPretrofits are
    great machines! Watching them run is awsome! Will Smith MV CA

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    293
    Thanks very, very much for all the kind remarks. Very much appreciated.

    Roland does some great stuff. Something to aspire towards. Well, heck, there are so many really smart and capable guys & gals here and over on the Yahoo boards it's amazing. I'm just tryin'g to keep up most days.

    Will:

    Did you get that Series II Boss that was on e-Bay about a year ago in Arizona that went for $1500? Man, that was a steal. $1500 is a steal no matter where you got it at! Yeah, that's the way to go no doubt.

    Yeah the 2J's seem expensive. I think their price is actually kept up by the import iron oddly enough.

    -jd
    John Delaney
    www.rwicooking.com

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    334
    JD.....Bought my Boss4 in Aug. 2002. Just started working on it this summer.
    Picked it up at Mare Island Naval facility. The first thing I did was strip the Navy Gray paint off the polished aluminum head. It had not seen much use and the spindle & axis motors all ran well. On this retrofit I'm mounting a motherboard,PS & hard drive on the enclosure door(ala R. Friestad) using the USB port in the door & a Flash drive for input.
    this may be of interest to the guy's because it occupies 14" x 8" x 4" and is a dirt cheap solution (Tiger Direct)to the computer requirement. W. Smith
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails BP Boss  010.jpg   BP GT101  Elect. Panels.jpg  

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    293
    That's nice. It's got the bigger table with all the coolant gutters & such. I'm constantly surprised by the number of different configurations I see. That one appears to be a series I with the motor driven head mid section and the larger series II style table.

    But the knee, column, ram and several parts of the head all look to be Series I stuff. Of course there are a lot of these like this on this board. Those axis motor heat sinks are unsual. Big.

    Well, good deal, keep us posted.

    Mare Island eh? I'll have to keep an eye out for that kind of stuff.

    Best,
    -jd
    John Delaney
    www.rwicooking.com

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    832
    JD thats a Series I CNC with the V Ram, the series II has a much larger travel and table way design is totally different as you will see in the pic of Andrew McCalip's lovely retrofit. The Series II as the Series I had lots of different head/ram configerations.
    Hood

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    334
    Hood,
    Nice picture......would like to see a full view of the machine,
    interested in head & knee details!
    Is that a column extension or is it integral to the base casting?
    w. Smith

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    832
    Its not my machine, the young lad in the pic is the very tallented owner. He has a thread on another forum and that is where I got the pic from.
    Yes that is a riser block , normally the V Ram would be mounted directly on the base column. You will find Andrews thread HERE. (hope its ok to post a link to another froum, if not Moderators please remove it)
    Hood

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    334
    Hood,
    Thanks for the link to Andrew's site. He's a very industrious young man!
    Also checked JD's site and found your links. You are doing some nice work too!
    Was also interested to see that we all have different approaches to our Z axis
    Retrofits. Am about 80% finished on both machines, like JD i've had to fine tune
    my electronic assy's. Will Smith
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails B'port 2J Retro Z axis.jpg   B'port 2J Retro Z axis2.jpg  

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    832
    Hi Will,
    Looks good, but I am curious the way it mounts? ie is it the tramming bolts that you are using for the Z bracket?
    Any more details/pics of your retrofits?
    Hood

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    334
    Hood,
    Yes, I'm using the tramming Bolts.
    Enclosed are pictures of my Boss 4, painted & polished & gathering dust in the rear of the shop, while I'm finishing the control console & Elec. enclosure.
    There are 2 pictures of my 2J on JD's site #104, here are a couple more.
    Regards, will Smith
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Bridgeport RETRO 010.jpg   Bridgeport 2J RETRO 011.jpg   Boss 4 Painted.jpg   BP Boss Retro -F.jpg  


Page 1 of 2 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •