587,051 active members*
3,764 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
Page 2 of 5 1234
Results 21 to 40 of 86
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1880
    what exactly does 4 pole tell us? and if 4 pole keeps them from working witht the rutex drives what drives will work. Although I don't recall any of the driver makers specifying what poles their motors will or will not work with.

    So I am think this is a non issue?
    thanks
    Michael T.
    "If you don't stand for something, chances are, you'll fall for anything!"

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    24223
    The Commutation pulse tells the amp when to switch, it does not need to know how many poles the motor has.
    Al.
    CNC, Mechatronics Integration and Custom Machine Design

    “Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
    Albert E.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    8

    motor poles

    Older style or should I say analog type drive (not digital drives )usually could care less about the number of poles as these drives are typically trapazodial
    drives. However if using a newer digital drive where you usually do motor setup with a windows based program provided by the drive manufacture one of the paramaters you must enter is number of motor poles so he can communitate the drive current as it is done sinisodially vs trapazodially.
    (I am a creative speller) I have no experience with Ruthex but am certain these motors are 4 pole.I Have gone through configuring one on a Tecknic 3000 drive and 4 pole is the right answer.
    Paul

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    24223
    Quote Originally Posted by miljnor
    what exactly does 4 pole tell us? and if 4 pole keeps them from working witht the rutex drives what drives will work. Although I don't recall any of the driver makers specifying what poles their motors will or will not work with.
    If you want to detect the pole count, use the method I outlined earlier of making a star point with the three phases and using the neutral point as common, rotate the shaft one mechanical revolution and 'scope count the electrical cycles per one mechanical rev. Or you can use the hall outputs.
    Each high and low is one electrical cycle. The electrical cycles times 2 gives you the motor pole count.
    The more poles a brushless DC motor has, provides smoother rotation at low rpm.
    Al.
    CNC, Mechatronics Integration and Custom Machine Design

    “Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
    Albert E.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1207
    Quote Originally Posted by Al_The_Man
    If you want to detect the pole count, use the method I outlined earlier of making a star point with the three phases and using the neutral point as common, rotate the shaft one mechanical revolution and 'scope count the electrical cycles per one mechanical rev. Or you can use the hall outputs.
    Each high and low is one electrical cycle. The electrical cycles times 2 gives you the motor pole count.
    The more poles a brushless DC motor has, provides smoother rotation at low rpm.
    Al.
    How about this method:
    Use some lab power supply to drive some current thru one phase winding and then rotate shaft by hand. Now you can easily count how many "steps" motor has per revolution.

    My motor has three steps per revolution. I guess this makes it six pole motor. I have verified that with scope using your method.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1880
    Hey Tom have you been able to test those motors yet?
    thanks
    Michael T.
    "If you don't stand for something, chances are, you'll fall for anything!"

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    170
    Gentlemen,

    I received my 2 surplus ctr motors on Monday, and A DATA sheet too! I looked it all over, and also forwarded it to Vladimir for his review. Talking with him last evening about the motors he said this:

    They should work fine with the R2030 drives. They should also work fine with the R992H drives.

    Because of the increased orders resulting from these surplus center motors being available, I've had a rush on the R992H drives, so we only have 3 left in the USA and 25 in Australia.

    The R2030's will go into production next week. Vladimir has all the parts in hand, and only has to have the pcb's made then the drives populated.

    Back to the motors:

    I had called two different Sanyo Denki offices and received conflicting info from both of them. Forget what they said, the data sheet tells it all.

    The motors have commutating encoders in them. This means that they have everything we need to run them. The commutation is done by the encoder instead of by real hall effect transistors. This is actually better than hall effect transistors. The encoder is a 2000 line encoder, which means that they will put out 8000 per revolution, however, with the step multiplier, Vladimir says that can be effectively reduced to 2000 (multiplier set to 4) with good results.

    The 1000 watt motor should have brake resistors installed. .5 ohms, 50 watts per motor wire (3 of them).

    We will not use the brake. It will have to be electrically energized all the time, because the brake is on all the time. The brake takes 24vdc to energize and only .33 amps. That should not be a problem to anyone, as the Rutex drives need 24vdc anyhow, and I don't think it would be a problem to hook up the brake to the same 24 vdc power supply unless one is energizing and de-energizing it. Use a diode mounted in reverse at the brake terminals to obsorb the energy generated by the brake when it is de-energized. If you plan to use the brake, make sure you have lots of filtering on the capacitor.

    So, I expect to have the new supply of R2030 brushless drives in by the end of the month now. Vladimir said he is going to have them made now.

    That's the report! I hope to actually try one of them out soon. I need to order some braking resistors for my 1000 watt motor.

    Tom Eldredge
    Rutex LLC
    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    35538
    Surplus Center has two different 300W motors. Is it safe to assume that either one will work?
    Gerry

    UCCNC 2017 Screenset
    http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2017.html

    Mach3 2010 Screenset
    http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2010.html

    JointCAM - CNC Dovetails & Box Joints
    http://www.g-forcecnc.com/jointcam.html

    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1880
    Awsome I will probably pick some more up for later usage!

    The two different versions are just One with brake and the other without brake.
    thanks
    Michael T.
    "If you don't stand for something, chances are, you'll fall for anything!"

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    813
    I'm in no hurry to get the drives; but I did not want to miss the servos
    I knew there was an encoder; its in the discription
    I will setup and test the mill on the steppers; then change to servos after the fact; this way I don't have to learn something new as i set-up the axis movements etc

    Thanks for the update Tom
    I'm off to Disney in a week and half; so nothing will; get done on the mill untill the vacation is over; however the lathe is full speed ahead

  11. #31
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    813
    Quote Originally Posted by rutexus


    The motors have commutating encoders in them. This means that they have everything we need to run them. The commutation is done by the encoder instead of by real hall effect transistors. This is actually better than hall effect transistors. The encoder is a 2000 line encoder, which means that they will put out 8000 per revolution, however, with the step multiplier, Vladimir says that can be effectively reduced to 2000 (multiplier set to 4) with good results

    Tom Eldredge
    Rutex LLC
    Fotgot to ask on the last post
    Tom // What kind of rapids etc can we expect with these and step and direction from Mach3 or Turbocnc???

  12. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1880
    this is a total guess but mach3 can run at 25khz, 35khz, and 45khz so I am guessing that these are the limit in pulses per second on each axis so at the top speed of the encoder you would get 45000hz/encoder pusles = 22.5 x 60secs= 1350rpm.
    thanks
    Michael T.
    "If you don't stand for something, chances are, you'll fall for anything!"

  13. #33
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    35538
    With the 4x multiplier, as Tom mentioned, you get the 1350rpm. Without it, you get:
    45000 / 8000 = 5.625 x 60 = 337rpm

    If you spring for a Gecko G-Rex w/ Mach4 (probably somewhere between $400-$800 when Mach4 is ready), you can get:
    4,000,000 / 8000 = 500 * 60 = 30,000 rpm, or at least the motor max of 3000 rpm.
    Gerry

    UCCNC 2017 Screenset
    http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2017.html

    Mach3 2010 Screenset
    http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2010.html

    JointCAM - CNC Dovetails & Box Joints
    http://www.g-forcecnc.com/jointcam.html

    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

  14. #34
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    813
    Mach4 has USB right?

  15. #35
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    35538
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevie
    Mach4 has USB right?
    No. It'll connect to the G-Rex via ethernet. The G-Rex will have a USB port, but Mach4 won't use it.
    Gerry

    UCCNC 2017 Screenset
    http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2017.html

    Mach3 2010 Screenset
    http://www.thecncwoodworker.com/2010.html

    JointCAM - CNC Dovetails & Box Joints
    http://www.g-forcecnc.com/jointcam.html

    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

  16. #36
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    813
    Quote Originally Posted by rutexus

    We will not use the brake. It will have to be electrically energized all the time, because the brake is on all the time. The brake takes 24vdc to energize and only .33 amps. That should not be a problem to anyone, as the Rutex drives need 24vdc anyhow, and I don't think it would be a problem to hook up the brake to the same 24 vdc power supply unless one is energizing and de-energizing it. Use a diode mounted in reverse at the brake terminals to obsorb the energy generated by the brake when it is de-energized. If you plan to use the brake, make sure you have lots of filtering on the capacitor.


    Tom Eldredge
    Rutex LLC
    Actually I will need to use the brake on my mill; the spindle and the drive/stepper etc will need to be held up if power is lost

  17. #37
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    1365
    Current to supply these:
    I ordered a set of 400W Motors which the nameplate currrent is 8.7A. If Im going to run 3 of these motors, do I need 3*8.7amps available at all times or only about 10 amps total?
    I know that its similar to the 10 amps total with brushed servos, but no idea how this is going to work out.

    Thanks,
    Jon

  18. #38
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    813
    I would think you'll need enough for all axis to move at once; otherwise you'll run out of power

  19. #39
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    170
    Gentlemen,

    I'll try to address a few issues at one time.

    First, the question of rpm's with the surplus center motors. The calculations done above appear to me to be right. 1350 rpm with the step multiplier.

    The mention of the Gecko /Mach4 combination is interesting, but can you buy one today? It has been in the works for the last few years. The spi mode of the new Rutex 2000 series drives also allows for very fast motion. I remember Vladimir saying 80 million steps per second theoretically. The DLL for the spi is still un-documented, but the spi is already in use with the Rutex tuning program. I hope the documentation becomes available this fall. The drives we are shipping already have the spi functionality built in. As I said, it is already used by the Rutex tuning software. Once the DLL is documented, you can access it too. The mother boards also are already configured for it as well.

    DRO question?

    Once the spi is documented for general use (we have two users programming with it I believe right now) the exact position of the motor is accessible at any moment in time through the spi. There is no way to read them through the Rutex drives presently in the step and direction mode. You could tap into the encoder signal wires of course but that is not the same as reading a decoder.

    Thats all for now.

    Tom Eldredge
    Rutex LLC
    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

  20. #40
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    170
    Jeffitig,

    You should be fine with the 10 amps as you figured it.

    Tom
    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

Page 2 of 5 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •