586,067 active members*
5,272 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
Page 1 of 2 12
Results 1 to 20 of 24
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    476

    DIY Lifting Cart using 4 bottle jacks!

    I want to build a steel cart with four hydraulic bottle jacks attached to it that can move my Bridgeport mill. The idea is to avoid the safey hazzards and hassle associated with using an engine hoist or pallet jack. I want to be able to move my mills around the garage on a whim, and without needing a second person.

    Recently, I started a thread asking if a pallet jack could be used to move a Bridgeport sized mill. The answer is yes, but not very safely.

    http://www.cnczone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=19435

    So here's my first attempt at mocking up the idea. Just a bunch of 4" square steel tubes. The dolly can adjust to differnt size pedestals for a range between a series I mill and a Series II mill. The size can be adjusted by sliding the red tubes through the corner brackets. I'll pin the tubes in place, sort of like my adjustable shop crane from Harbor freight.

    The small orange cylinders are cheap 4ton hydraulic bottle jacks. I picked up 4 of them today from Harbor Freight for about $45 total.

    The yellow parts are intended to sit on top of rollers. So to lift and move a mill, I would assemble the pieces around the mill's pedestal base, adjust to size, and start jacking the mill up. Once it clears the ground, I should be able to start moving right away.

    One problem is weight. I think I overdid it, with 3/8" wall thickness. My CAD software predicts a weight of almost 1000lbs for just the dolly! Any ideas? I don't have a good feel for how thin to make the walls, or what size tube to use. I want this thing to be able to handle moving up to a 4 ton mill.

    This is still the pie-in-the-sky design stage, so I welcome any criticism, pointers, ideas, or questions!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails lifting_dolly_idea.jpg   lifting_dolly_jack.jpg  

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    1873
    Damae,
    If you are intending to move it very frequently that may be a good idea.

    What I did was simply use 4 HD caster wheels, tilted the front up, remove the leveling pads, insert the dual wheel HD casters, let it down, same for the back, roll into place then reinstall the leveling pads.

    Same on my lathe, works real easy if you have reasonably smooth floor.

    Ken

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    674
    4", 3/8" wall tubing in that configuration is beyond overkill. That's the type of metal you would use to lift about 40 tons, not 4 tons. Besides, that stuff costs what... $30 a foot?

    Note that a typical 2-ton engine hoist uses 2.5", 1/8" wall tubing (or rather its metric equivalent) telescoping inside 3" 1/8" wall tubing, and it is just a single tube supported on one end. You have two tubes supported on both ends.

    In any case, I don't think a pallet jack is necessarily unsafe for a BP mill. It's just that a BP isn't set up to be lifted by one without a pallet in place, and unfortunately, used BPs rarely come with pallets. (In contrast, some machines like my 1800 lb woodworking jointer is set on top of two 4x4 blocks. I can move it around with a pallet jack, even though it has no pallet. w0w)

    I bought a 9x42 Jet not too long ago. It had a decently sturdy pallet. He problem was that it was not designed for a pallet jack. Fork lift only with the forks spread farther apart than usual. My machine is therefore sitting on the ground right now. If I find the need to make it mobile, I will probably use wood to build a new pallet. The plan would be to get some redwood 4x4s, plane them down to about 2.75 x 3.5", screw a couple 2x6s on top, and that's it. $40 solution. I would probably chamfer the edges and paint it Jet black with automotive paint to make it look "stealthy". :cheers:

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    866
    one issue with moving something as heavy as a bridgeport is that you have to get it stopped once you get it moving. Since from your picture, you weigh somewhat less than 2000 lbs, there could be a problem.

    At work, they moved the bridgeports on a 2 wheeled dolly. Then there was a third piece like a Johnson bar on the front. When they wanted to stop, they let down the Jobar, and it stopped. They didn't use jacks at all -- they lifted it using the knee.

    I've moved some incredibly heavy things on a pallet jack, but none were that tall. Bridgeports are top heavy.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1408
    [QUOTE=damae]I want to build a steel cart with four hydraulic bottle jacks QUOTE]

    Dear damae,

    One thing you have to look out for with some bottle jacks is they specify a maximum "lift" of a certain number of inches, but what really happens is that they sink back maybe 3/4" before actually holding. In other words, the max lift is not the one that they can maintain (without you continuously pumping!)

    I got caught out by this once.

    Best wishes

    Martin

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    476
    Quote Originally Posted by Ken_Shea
    ... What I did was simply use 4 HD caster wheels, tilted the front up, remove the leveling pads, insert the dual wheel HD casters, let it down, same for the back, roll into place then reinstall the leveling pads.....
    Ken, what are HD casters? Are these solid steel wheels? Do you know of a good source for such wheels?

    Quote Originally Posted by Zumba
    4", 3/8" wall tubing in that configuration is beyond overkill. That's the type of metal you would use to lift about 40 tons, not 4 tons. Besides, that stuff costs what... $30 a foot? .....
    I hadn't priced it yet, but I was hoping to find the steel I need at a local scrapyard for $.025/lb. Which is still expensive with it weighing so much! I'll try reducing the tubes to 3" and a thinner wall. That should save a lot of weight. I also had a 1" thick steel plate as part of the footing. That can probably be a lot thinner. The steel base on the jack itself is only 0.25" thick. Your point about wall thicknesses on an engine hoist is a good one.

    Quote Originally Posted by Zumba
    ...In any case, I don't think a pallet jack is necessarily unsafe for a BP mill. It's just that a BP isn't set up to be lifted by one without a pallet in place, and unfortunately, used BPs rarely come with pallets. (In contrast, some machines like my 1800 lb woodworking jointer is set on top of two 4x4 blocks. I can move it around with a pallet jack, even though it has no pallet. w0w)
    .....
    Another good point. Do you think this is still true for a 3ton Series II mill? I have limited celiing height, but there should be enough room to fit a permanent pallet under my Series I mills. My new Shizuoka is Series II size and I don't yet know if a pallet will fit.

    Quote Originally Posted by unterhaus
    one issue with moving something as heavy as a bridgeport is that you have to get it stopped once you get it moving. Since from your picture, you weigh somewhat less than 2000 lbs, there could be a problem......
    Haha. Yes, I do weigh just under 2000lbs; about 1800 pounds short! I have a flat floor. Then again, it's probably got a little slope. What exactly is a Johnson bar? I haven't heard of it before.

    Quote Originally Posted by unterhaus
    I've moved some incredibly heavy things on a pallet jack, but none were that tall. Bridgeports are top heavy.
    This is the fundamental problem with bridgeport mills -- they're top heavy. No matter if you're lifting with a pallet jack, shop crane (aka. engine hoist), or some custom dolly, the lifting device is always a small fraction of the mill's mass. So no matter how you lift, you don't change the center of mass very much, unless you add mass to the system. That's why a forklift work so well =)

    [QUOTE=martinw...One thing you have to look out for with some bottle jacks is they specify a maximum "lift" of a certain number of inches, but what really happens is that they sink back maybe 3/4" before actually holding. In other words, the max lift is not the one that they can maintain (without you continuously pumping!)....[/QUOTE]

    Wow, thanks for the heads-up! I didn't know about this limitation! For my application, I only need to lift 2" to get it off the floor. Do I need to lift it to 3" and let it settle first? Perhaps they need to be bled to remove air from the system? The manual that came with mine had instructions for bleeding the air out.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    476

    Revised design (Rev 02)

    Ok, second try. I reduced the weight from ~1000lbs to 520lbs. Changed to 3" tubes, with a maximum of 1/4" wall. I think I can go thinner yet.

    Does anyone have a link to standard box steel shapes and wall thicknesses? What is a standard wall thickness between 1/8" and 1/4"?

    Also, I don't yet own a set of Hilman rollers ("Skates") and am interested in finding an alternative. Some large diameter steel wheels would be great, if anyone can point me in the direction of a source.

    Thanks for all the great feedback and ideas so far. Keep the ideas and comments coming!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails lifting_dolly_rev02.jpg  

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1408
    Quote Originally Posted by damae
    I didn't know about this limitation! For my application, I only need to lift 2" to get it off the floor. Do I need to lift it to 3" and let it settle first? Perhaps they need to be bled to remove air from the system? The manual that came with mine had instructions for bleeding the air out.
    Dear damae,

    The jacks I used didn't have an air bleed facility, and I do not know if the "fall back" was just because mine were really cheapies. If you can, my advice would be to buy one jack and load it up to whatever you will be using it at. See how much it sinks under load, bleed air, and repeat. Then you have all the information to make the decision about whether to buy another three of the same type. The important thing is to see how much it sinks under load, beause it will not sink when really lightly loaded.

    Hope this helps.

    Best wishes

    Martin

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    12177
    Your first design was indeed serious overkill which I am all in favor of; BSH engineering (Built like a Brick S**t House)

    One thing you might not find are tubes in the 3" square region that slide together nicely and a sliding fit is an integral part of your design. You can get square tube that is around 0.20" wall thickness that will take 2" square inside; it is used for the receiver on trailer hitches. I think 2" square 1/4" wall tube would probably be large enough for your frame for moving bridgeports but whther it would take your 4 ton goal I do not know.

    Regarding the fall back on your jacks you should have pin holes in the vertical tubes that the legs slide in. Jack it up and put in a locking pin.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    476
    Jack, good idea about testing the bottle jack under load. I already bought 4 of them, but could always return them. Now, to find something that weighs a [literal] ton and figure how to keep it on top of the jack. Oh... I can jack up 1/2 of my mitsubishi.. it weighs about 4000lbs.

    Geof, excellent idea about the vertical locking pin! That would also help coordinate the heights on all 4 sides, by counting how many holes up the locking pin is.

    Anyone know where I can find large steel wheels?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    12177
    Quote Originally Posted by damae
    Anyone know where I can find large steel wheels?
    Steel wheels? Use rubber wheels.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails SMMHOME01.JPG  

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1408
    Quote Originally Posted by Geof
    Regarding the fall back on your jacks you should have pin holes in the vertical tubes that the legs slide in. Jack it up and put in a locking pin.
    Dear Geof,

    I absolutely agree, but the problem is that you have four jacks to attend to and they "sink" almost instantly. You cannot attend to four jacks at the same time unless you have four hands. A squid might manage, but humans will not.

    Best wishes

    Martin

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    476
    Geof, thanks for the picture! Steel casters have the advantage of being easy to mount, and hopefully being cheap. But a picture of rubber tires in use moving a real machine are pretty convincing!

    I'd need wheels rated at 2000lbs each, or 4 pairs of wheels rated at 1000lbs each.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    476
    Quote Originally Posted by martinw
    ...I absolutely agree, but the problem is that you have four jacks to attend to and they "sink" almost instantly. You cannot attend to four jacks at the same time unless you have four hands. A squid might manage, but humans will not.
    I think Geof's idea was to use the locking pin as a safety backup, kind of like the jack stands you put under a car. At least, that's how I would use them. =)

    The racthet/pawl method sounds nice because it would be an automatic safety backup. Hmm. But letting the fixture down might be hard to do that way.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    413
    Geof, neat picture, don't tell me you pulled that super mini down the road like that. I hope you at least kept her under 60 mph!!

    Damae, notice in Geof's pic the size of the tubes. I don't know for sure but I believe that machine is around 3000 lbs. I live on a farm and as such have made many atachments for various things on the farm. I can tell you from first hand experience that 4" by 4" by 1/4" wall square tube will take a lot of weight. We have a set of bale forks for round bale that are made out of two four foot long pieces. When you take a 1100 lbs bale centered at 2.5 feet out and bounce a good foot of the forks thats putting a serious load on. I do that almost every other day. One thing I have learned is things must be welded togher properly or you can rip the walls of a tube. What we like to do is where ever you have two tube butt togehter at right angle, cut a piece of flat stock to fit inside the longer one and weld it in even with the edges of the short one. This forces the load to twist the entire tube rather than rip out a section of the outer wall.

    For the load you're looking at that doesn't jump around much I would suggest maybe 1" by 3" by 1/8" wall. The last time I moved my Lagun around we just picked it up by a eye bolt right behind the head.(with a front end loader of course but that definatly won't fit in a low overhead spot!!!) You can slide the head back and forth to level it and no risk of tipping over.

    JP

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    413
    Aloso Geof, let me guess you raised the machine up by putting air in the tires?

    JP

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    12177
    Quote Originally Posted by JPMach
    Aloso Geof, let me guess you raised the machine up by putting air in the tires?JP
    That is an innovative guess but the answer is no. You can't see it easily but the machine is hung from the leveling screws. The frame was assembled around the machine and then nuts put on the top end of the leveling screws and the machine lifted up until the weight was on the wheels. Actually the machine weight is around 5500 lbs; the frame was tested by loading it up with 6500 lb of aluminum that we had in stock. Do you want to see the full sequence of machine transport pictures?

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    413
    Quote Originally Posted by Geof
    Do you want to see the full sequence of machine transport pictures?
    Yes...
    How far did you have to move it?

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    12177
    Quote Originally Posted by JPMach
    Yes...
    How far did you have to move it?
    I put it in a new thread in Haas forum.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    362
    I have been moving my mill for 20 years with a pallet jack. In fact I leave the mill bolted to the pallet on a permanent basis. It is admittedly a heavy duty pallet built of oak. Leaving it on the pallet has an added bonus of raising the machine to a more comfortable eye level. When I move it, I just jack it up till it clears the floor by 3/8". This way if it wobbles when it travels across the floor, it will only tilt 3/8" before the floor catches the machine thereby preventing it from falling over. Insert the pallet jack from the side and you will prevent most on the unstable nature of the mill. I have moved much heavier machinery than a mill with this process and never had a moments problem. The main point is to jack from the side and not head on. It is truly quite easy. The pallet jack I use is one of the imports rated at 2500kg so it easily carries the load. Jack from the side.

Page 1 of 2 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •