586,409 active members*
2,895 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
IndustryArena Forum > CAM Software > BobCad-Cam > Equidistant step over
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    214

    Equidistant step over

    I am using a 1/32 ball end mill on alum, using the Equidistant offset with a step over of .004" and in the allowance -.002", does that mean it is cutting .006"?
    I am trying to understand stepover, is stepover down and over .004?
    David L. Aery
    www.hooksolutions.com

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    4548

    Re: Equidistant step over

    Stepover is the space between the equal distance passes. The allowance is to leave stock after doing an initial material removal, to run a second pass with a smaller stepover, to get a better finish.

    There is no "down" or depth option. It is a surface based toolpath that gets its depth from the driving surface.

    I don't think the "allowance" being set as a negative number is an intent. It WOULD be interesting if it was offsetting the surface in more, though, but I wouldn't be surprised with erroneous results...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    214

    Re: Equidistant step over

    ok thanks, that helps. I have given you explanation a lot of thought and I understand why it is stepover only. I thought it had to go down also but I can see that now.
    I attached a pic of what I cut.
    This is a fishing lure mold to pour lead in and sometimes it does not weigh enough and that is why I use the negative allowance to make it slightly bigger and this works.
    David L. Aery
    www.hooksolutions.com

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    3376

    Re: Equidistant step over

    I think it would be better to "lie" about the size of your end mill

  5. #5

    Re: Equidistant step over

    The thing you have to watch with a Surface base TP and using a negative allowance is it will throw off your radius's and diameters or your 3d part. But it should work for what you are trying to do just fine.

    Another toolpath you an try on it is Project Curves and select the Offset setting and set a number of offsets along with a step over distance. Depending on the part I like using it better then Equidistant on most stuff and it computes way quicker as well.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    214

    Re: Equidistant step over

    thanks, I think negative allowance sounds better than lying:nono: sorry I couldn't resist.

    another toolpath you an try on it is Project Curves and select the Offset setting and set a number of offsets along with a step over distance
    I found Project curves but not as a toolpath. I have version 25 - 3 axis Pro, maybe it is in a newer version
    David L. Aery
    www.hooksolutions.com

Similar Threads

  1. V26 Equidistant offset not climb cutting
    By Ben S in forum BobCad-Cam
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-02-2015, 12:53 AM
  2. Equidistant tool path not as expexted
    By Ozcad in forum BobCad-Cam
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-04-2014, 06:04 AM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-31-2013, 08:53 PM
  4. Equidistant Offset
    By seal1966 in forum BobCad-Cam
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 08-02-2013, 08:57 PM
  5. Equidistant Offset operation
    By orizaba in forum BobCad-Cam
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-22-2008, 01:41 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •