586,076 active members*
3,726 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
IndustryArena Forum > Machine Controllers Software and Solutions > UCCNC Control Software > Leaving Mach3 for UCCNC - Hardware migration question
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    76

    Question Leaving Mach3 for UCCNC - Hardware migration question

    Hi

    Fired up the router this morning to discover the latest w10 update had killed Mach3, AGAIN !
    Fair enough, it is very old software, so be it.

    I am planning on switching to UCCNC and am hoping it is as simple as pulling out the Smoothstepper and replacing it with a UC100. Downstream is a KTA-205 https://oceancontrols.com.au/KTA-205.html that has served me very well for many years.

    Apart from the software learning curve, am I going to be that lucky ??

    BTW, PC is an i7 with 12Gb RAM, I expect that will handle UCCNC.

    Thanks in advance

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    1516
    Quote Originally Posted by uspl View Post
    Hi

    Fired up the router this morning to discover the latest w10 update had killed Mach3, AGAIN !
    Fair enough, it is very old software, so be it.

    I am planning on switching to UCCNC and am hoping it is as simple as pulling out the Smoothstepper and replacing it with a UC100. Downstream is a KTA-205 https://oceancontrols.com.au/KTA-205.html that has served me very well for many years.

    Apart from the software learning curve, am I going to be that lucky ??

    BTW, PC is an i7 with 12Gb RAM, I expect that will handle UCCNC.

    Thanks in advance
    If already using a smoothstepper with a breakout board. May I suggest you forget the UC100 and get a UC400eth instead?. Ethernet is better and it has the same idc26 connections as the smoothstepper.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    4375

    Re: Leaving Mach3 for UCCNC - Hardware migration question

    Hi,
    what about Mach4?

    A new UC100 or UC300 or UC400 and a UCCNC license would be about the same as a Mach4 license. Your existing ESS will do Mach4 just fine, I've been using Mach4 ans an ESS
    for eight years.

    Craig

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    4375

    Re: Leaving Mach3 for UCCNC - Hardware migration question

    Hi,
    just as a matter of interest if you do decide to get a UC100, and I certainly have no reason to disbelieve that it would not be a workable solution, don't buy one of the Chinese rip-off uc100's that abound on
    Ebay and Amazon....they are not a patch on the real thing by CNCDrive (Hungary).

    Craig

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    149

    Re: Leaving Mach3 for UCCNC - Hardware migration question

    I did the same thing on my router a few years ago. I went with uc300-ub1. It worked so well I duplicated the same controller on my mill a few years later. The other thing I would consider is acorn..I agree with dazp1976, I would go with ethernet.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    1516

    Re: Leaving Mach3 for UCCNC - Hardware migration question

    Another option is to get hold of a retail version of win7 sp1. Once it's installed that's the end of it. You don't get the updating, it stays as it is and doesn't mess Mach3 up.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    149

    Re: Leaving Mach3 for UCCNC - Hardware migration question

    I did the same thing on my router a few years ago. I went with uc300-ub1. It worked so well I duplicated the same controller on my mill a few years later. The other thing I would consider is acorn..I agree with dazp1976, I would go with ethernet.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •