Hi,
That is par for the course for XHC...they've got your money...what matter to them if it does not work?I emailed them month ago but got no reply.
No, I do not. If XHC can't help you why would you think that I or anyone else can?Do you have an idea to solve my problem without replacing the board ?
I have given you some recommendations to research. I personally use an Ethernet SmoothStepper (ESS). Note that the ESS (and UC100, UC300 and UC400 come to that) require a breakout board in additionor can you give me an exact recommendation for a good 4 or better 5 axis breakout board ?
to the motion board.
You are confusing a motion board and a breakout board. A motion board converts Machs numeric trajectory data into accurately timed pulse streams. This requires dedicated hardware, in some case a microcontroller
or an FPGA. The XHC board you have has an FPGA. A breakout board takes those pulse streams, usually amplifies them a bit and presents them to the outside world usually in the form of screw terminations.
The breakout board does not have any logic per se, but protects the more expensive and sensitive microcontroller or FPGA from damage because you hooked up the wires wrong. The XHC board you have
bundles both motion controller and breakout board into one.
Other motion controllers like the ESS have separate motion and breakout boards.
Good luck. If the manufacturer won't help you then you'll need some luck.If its just the board it might be ok. A solution would still be better.
Craig