586,105 active members*
3,281 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
IndustryArena Forum > CNC Electronics > CNC Machine Related Electronics > Need help deciding if Granite Devices will work with my servos
Page 1 of 6 123
Results 1 to 20 of 103
  1. #1

    Need help deciding if Granite Devices will work with my servos

    Hi im in need of some advice, Im planning on fitting a new set of electronics to a 20 year old mechanicaly sound machine. The system is not making the most of the machine and I would like to run it with Mach 3 or similer.

    The idea is to use a Granite driver for the two West amp servos and Encoders ( Not motor mounted ). And a third drive with a smaller stepper motor for the Z-axis. All drivers to be connected to a granite devices Breakout board and all driver will have there own power supplies.

    The large servo motors are rated at 140v max is this too large for the standard Granite devices driver to handle?

    The motors are made by WestAmp, the model number is MT233

    The encoder is made by Dynamic Research Corp, Model number: 25-F010-B06-2048-AXZ0


    Cheers
    Gav

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1660
    The Vsd-e drives are only rated to 80 [or is it 90vdc] so you'd only be getting 80/140=57% of the max speed of the motor at this reduced voltage. Tero used to sell a higher voltage drive, but has since dis-continued them. There was talk of producing a high voltage version of the Vsd-e drive.. but I've not seen any talk of it since.. [or know if it's been done].

    If your wanting to run those motors at 140vdc then I'd think your limited to a more commercial level drive [AB or some such].. which is too bad as the Granites are very nice drives [I love mine ]

    J
    JerryFlyGuy
    The more I know... the more I realize I don't
    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    2985
    Tero is supposedly working on a 160V version, but it has been delayed several times. If that gets done, it would be a good fit, otherwise you will not be getting top performance from your motors.

    Where are your encoders if they are not on the motor?

    A VSD-E is overkill for a small stepper motor. I would go with a gecko for that, but a VSD-E would work fine as well if you want all matching drives.

    Maybe Tero will chime in and let us know when(if) there will be a 160V version available.

    Matt

  4. #4
    You can see the encoder mounted on the underside of the y-axis in the photo below, the x-axis encoder is tooth belt driven straight off the servo.



    I've started a build thread elsewhere, http://www.cnczone.com/forums/showth...t=67799&page=2

    I stupidly thought I would be alright just fitting a Gecko or Granite device driver for each axis, now its looking like my motors are too big to drive and the machine to heavy to accept some smaller motors

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    887
    If the VSD-E won't do it and if you're interested in a kit you might want to have a look at the HP-UHU. It's not a plug-n-play drive, you'll have to assemble it yourself so you need some knowlege about electronics. They should be good for your 140V motors and are capable of ~25A or there abouts. (I've run mine with a 160V supply during testing without trouble).

    It doesn't come even close to the VSD-E when it comes to features - it's just more power. Again, if you know your way around electronics you'll be fine, if not it's still very much doable but you're in for a ride and a learning experience.

    Another option is to look at the Viper200 from Larken. Threre are a couple of guys around here that uses them so you can read up on performance and suitablillity.

    I'm sorry for bringing up other products on the Granite forum but I'm pretty sure that Tero would like you to have the most suitable drive for your application even though it means it's not his. I have a set of VSD-A and I'm very impressed with them, hopefully the VSD-E will come in a 160VDC version, I'm sure it would be a killer drive.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1660
    Grav first, I'd get rid of the seperate encoder and put one on your motor. I think having it seperate down there is just asking for problems.

    As far as fitting smaller motors I don't think you need worry. I've got a router which has a gantry which weigh's well over 2000lbs and I drive it w/ two 70vdc servo's [Nema 34's] through a 10:1 reducer and into a 1.5" pinion. I can accellerate at 22in/s/s in Mach 3 and have a top speed up in the range of ~1200ipm [I've got it limited to 500 as I'm not comfortable w/ it being any faster]

    If your system was mine, I'd buy a VSD-E drive and power it up w/ the max allowed voltage and run it that way, you may experiance some slower rapids but you'll get all the same cutting power down low. Before you right it off, look at the actual numbers of performance you'll get. [ie do the math on the motor speed and reducers and gearing etc to see what your real world performance numbers will be]

    Lastly, as Henrik mentioned if you still feel your going to need the 140vdc drive buy a HP-UHU kit[s], if your not comfortable soldering them together I'm sure you'd have no problem getting someone to do it for you for a few dollars..

    Anyway, at the end of the day your not in that bad of a corner, and there are still viable options available to you.. don't lose heart... this is the 'fun' part of getting a machine up and running [there's always a few hills to climb.. just as Henrik about encoders he can tell you lots of stories about his 'hills' ]

    Keep us posted..

    J
    JerryFlyGuy
    The more I know... the more I realize I don't
    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

  7. #7
    Thanks for the info guys, it does sound promising .

    I would like to have a go at the HP-UHU, I have etched a few circuits with press n peel paper and feel confident enough in my soldering and diagram reading skills that I could populate the pcb. There is some doubt as to whether I can actually make it work, but it is by far the cheaper option avaliable and might be an intresting project

    I did notice someone was selling kits, this could be the way to go, instead of making my own pcb's.

    If I got one kit and a breakout board I could start experimenting with the motor. One possible problem I can see already is the encoder has SIX wires not FOUR? Could be older technology?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1660
    If you've done your own pcb's before you'll not have any issue soldering together your own boards. I'd buy the kits they come w/ the heavy traces where you need them etc.. less hassle and I don't think I could produce my own for the price of the kit..

    Your encoder is most likely a differential encoder [guess] IIRC my differential ones came w/ 6 wires [well 8 but the extra's are just grounds]
    JerryFlyGuy
    The more I know... the more I realize I don't
    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    887
    I'll second everything Jerry wrote. The PCB in the kits has thicker copper (70um) compared to normal (35um), and it's double-sided with plated thru holes. You can get the PCB or a complete kit from Paul (tenmetalman here on the 'zone) and/or from Irfan Ulla who's also a frequent user here. If you get the kit you'll get all the hard to get parts (in particullar the inductors) but you need to supply some mountig hardware, connectors etc.

    The encoder is, as Jerry also said most likely a differential type, which is a good thing. It has two wires each for the A and B signals. Both the VSD-E and the HP-UHU supports this type of encoder.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    24221
    Quote Originally Posted by gavztheouch View Post
    One possible problem I can see already is the encoder has SIX wires not FOUR? Could be older technology?
    The common encoder connection count is either 8 for differential encoders and 5 for single ended. if you have 6, it could be the 5 plus a shield or case ground.
    If they are DRC encoders like the one in your picture, the connections should be readily available.
    I assumed you have included the encoder power connections in the wire count?
    Al.
    CNC, Mechatronics Integration and Custom Machine Design

    “Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
    Albert E.

  11. #11
    I was wrong on the encoder wires it looks like 7 just checked and took a photo see below. This might mean 2 power, 2 each for the A and B signals and 1 earth? Problem is I dont know which is which. Do you think DRC might be able to provide a schematic I see they are still in business

    What info do I need on the motor? The datasheet is unavailable online, there is an info plate on the motor itself but it seems a little vague, I will post a photo a little later on to show you what I mean.





  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    24221
    At 20yrs old, that encoder is probably obsolete, but you may get the info by sending an email to DRC. It looks like 2048 p/rev. Also they have AXZ which could indicate marker pulse also.
    The motor will be the larger red & blk is the armature and the small red & blk the tach. and green/yellow ground.
    Al.
    CNC, Mechatronics Integration and Custom Machine Design

    “Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
    Albert E.

  13. #13
    At 20yrs old, that encoder is probably obsolete, but you may get the info by sending an email to DRC. It looks like 2048 p/rev. Also they have AXZ which could indicate marker pulse also.
    The motor will be the larger red & blk is the armature and the small red & blk the tach. and green/yellow ground.
    Al.
    Thanks Al

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    887
    IF you go for the HP-UHU please keep in mind that it's a bit limited regarding what encoder count frequency it can keep up with. The docs for the UHU-chip says at least 150kHz but during my tests I've found ~130kHz to be about max. With a 2048 count encoder that means around 950rpm which isn't that much. The VSD-E will have no problem at all in that respect.

    Now, you say that the encoder is mounted on you mechanics on not on the motor so it's unlikely it'll see 950rpm but as have been pointed out before you may run into other problems if the motor<->encoder coupling isn't "tight".

  15. #15
    If your wanting to run those motors at 140vdc then I'd think your limited to a more commercial level drive [AB or some such].. which is too bad as the Granites are very nice drives [I love mine ]
    Im not too fuzzed about using the original motors or having an overly fast machine, I plan to mainly cut 2d shapes, so if it takes me 5 mins with the 140v servos, I can live with waiting another 5 mins if it means I can get a working machine. ( Its a hobby-ish machine ie.. time is not money )

    What im worried about is wiring up the granites wrongly and causing damage to the drivers. How easy is it to damage these little things? I've seen multiple "I just filled the room with smoke threads " on servo drivers. And is it possible to fix them? That would be a benifit with the UHU I guess, I could just order some new parts and replace them

    Jerry do you have any info on your motors. Your machine sounds like a bit of a beast, do you have any photos? It would be good to see your gantry and compare it with mine, I tried lifting mine this morning could only just manage to slightly raise one end just of the ground by myself. My best guess is it could weight around 300-500KG.

    The y-axis on the other hand could easily lend itself to a smaller motor, it take very little effort to spin the motor and move the z-axis along its length.

    Gav

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1660
    Grav it's hard to say if the original motors would or would not work. I'd say you've got nothing to lose by trying them.. I'd think you'd want to mount an encoder directly to the motor rather than having it seperate [for the life of me I can't figure out why a OEM would do that.. they should know better]

    The granites aren't a problem to wire up [in my experiance anyway] I've never let the smoke out of them.. and if you read some of my previous posts you'll see I'm no electronic's expert [by a long stretch]

    Tero does offer a warrentee and repair service [as far as I know]. There is no question w/ the UHU's that if you built it.. you should be able to replace components, this is true.

    The motors I use are basically the same as the 33004's listed here...http://s120220635.onlinehome.us/servo-motors.asp However I wish I'd bought encoders w/ alot higher resolution [mine are 1250line from US Digital]
    I assume your X axis is dual driven [motor at each end]?
    I'd think these motors would work just SPIFFY on your machine [that is if your absolutely sure you don't want to use your existing ones].. it will still be lightening fast and have lots of power [even w/ alot of gear reduction to keep the speed down]

    I don't have any pictures of my machine w/ me [I'm at work] but I do have a video of it on youtube [or maybe two of them?] just do a search on youtube for my username [same as here] and they'll come up.

    Btw there have been some changes since those vids. The first one [surfaceing the spoil board] I was using a G100 and steppers the second one [aluminum] I had moved up to my new servo's and was back to Mach 3 w/ a parrallel port. I'm now in the middle or re-wiring the control to use a Smooth stepper and in the process am cleaning up the wiring [ALOT.. mind you if you saw my old control.. you'd realize it wouldn't take much to make an improvement ].

    Hth

    J
    JerryFlyGuy
    The more I know... the more I realize I don't
    (Note: The opinions expressed in this post are my own and are not necessarily those of CNCzone and its management)

  17. #17
    Thanks for the info Jerry,

    I might give the motors a ago and see what happens, it would certainly make life alot easier if I left them in there.

    I assume your X axis is dual driven [motor at each end]?
    No its just one motor mounted in the center which drives the gears at ethier end.

    I recieved an email last night from a chap who also supplies servo drives that will be able to power these motors. Turns out he has actually converted a machine exactly the same as mine to run with his drives. :banana:

    I'd think you'd want to mount an encoder directly to the motor rather than having it seperate [for the life of me I can't figure out why a OEM would do that.. they should know better]
    True it does seem strange espically as these motors have ports already in the motor casing bored out to take the encoder wires and there looks to be enough space under the lid to take an encoder inside the motor.

    I also spotted a gap in the rows of teeth that the encoder runs on, and its not a small one its clearly visable and would prob cause problems as this would allow the motor to rotate but the encoder would stay still untill it clears the gap.

    Here are some pictures of the top of the motor with the casing removed. Do you think I will be able to mount an encoder? Im thinking a hollow shaft encoder might reach down to the motor shaft to make a connection.




    A shot of the old driver boards and power supplies to the left hand side, I might be able to use these power supplies again if I stick with the same motors?


  18. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    24221
    Many of those motors had encoders mounted on the aluminum casting which is already drilled for the three mounting screws.
    They had a small coupling which connected the two shafts.
    Some were fitted with DRC and also Koyo make an identical body size that fits.
    Al.
    CNC, Mechatronics Integration and Custom Machine Design

    “Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere.”
    Albert E.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    1207
    Nice discussion in here!

    The 160VDC VSD-E version is coming for sure. The design is complete and now I'm waiting for quote & lead time from PCB assembly house. I'll post leadtime once I know it.

    Letting smoke out of VSD-E has been made difficult by means of protections that are absent in similar price drives.

    To comment the machine and encoders: there absolutely must be an encoder mounted on motor shaft. If encoder is located anywhere else, one will get very sluggis or unstable performance due to backlash and limited stiffness between motor and encoder.

  20. #20
    Nice to know the 160VDC VSD-E is on its way it looks like a nice unit, If you need someone to test your drives let me know

Page 1 of 6 123

Similar Threads

  1. will these servos work nema 23
    By dgalaxy in forum Servo Motors / Drives
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-07-2007, 02:20 AM
  2. getting servos to work using Mach 3
    By robert johnson in forum Mentors & Apprentice Locator
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-04-2007, 05:10 PM
  3. Will these Servos work with Rutex
    By Fabric8r in forum Servo Drives
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-07-2005, 08:00 PM
  4. Why won't cheap servos work?
    By Ubarch in forum Servo Motors / Drives
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-08-2005, 08:39 PM
  5. Servos on x/y - Stepper on z - will it work?
    By WoodSnarfer in forum Servo Motors / Drives
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-17-2004, 01:12 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •