587,402 active members*
3,068 visitors online*
Register for free
Login
IndustryArena Forum > WoodWorking Machines > DIY CNC Router Table Machines > 8020 based CNC router with Ahrens motion system
Page 1 of 2 12
Results 1 to 20 of 21
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    83

    8020 based CNC router with Ahrens motion system

    Ok. I've decided to make my own CNC since it would be much fun. And cheaper of course
    I've chosen the 8020 profiles and Ahrens linear motion system and it looks like this would be as close to the bolt-together kit as it can get.
    To be a little more specific about my router, I'm planning to machine aluminum plates and panels (mostly cut-outs and engraving). Working area - not less then 21"x12".
    I've come up with this design and this machine has actually bigger working area (around 22"x16") and a footprint of 24"x24". It's a fixed gantry design with moving table - I feel it would be more rigid this way.
    I REALLY-really need your comments on this 'cause I'm building a BOM now and most components will come from US (which is quite far from Russia) so I'd like to catch as many quirks/mistakes at the design stage as possible, so I don't have to ship something again .

    I haven't decided on the router yet. I'd really like to know what routers are suggested for cutting light metals effectively.
    I haven't done stepper calculations as well, but I'm going to do it asap. Any recommendations are appreciated! I think my Z-axis would weight around 10 kg, so I need powerfull motors to move this baby...
    Here go pictures.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Front.JPG   Isometric.JPG   Left.JPG  

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1166
    Hi Ilya,
    If you change your z-axis design, you can get less overhang for a smaller moment arm and also not have to raise and lower your z-axis motor. There are other examples of how to do this like Glacial Wanderer's design, but basically mount your steel Z-axis rail to the piece of extrusion that connects your Y-axis bearings and make that piece of extrusion longer. Then mount your Z-axis bearings to a plate of aluminum (like the one Ahren sells) and mount your router to that.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    83
    Hi jsheerin,
    Thanks for comments. Actually this design you were describing was my starting point - I tried to design it as Glacial Wanderer did. Gantry height was 13", however the clearance between the Z-axis extrusion end and the table is only 3.3" (that means maximum part height is 3.3"), and Z-plate stopped at 4.47" over the table and couldn't go any lower. That is too high (I may be wrong though). I can't increase clearance because Z-plate will stop even heigher which is unusable.
    With movable motor design I get the 6.1" clearance between the Z-axis extrusion and the table, the distance between the edge of Z-plate and the table is 1.39" all the way down and 7" all the way up. I admit that gantry is 3" taller (16" vs 13") however even if I make it 13" I'll still gain than in the lowest position of the plate.
    Now, I can see how the gantry height affects the arm length, but I can't see how it differs with different design approach.
    Sorry if the explanation is "cloudy", I can't post a picture right now but will do it if needed.
    Let me know what you think.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1166
    The arm length I mentioned is horizontal from the gantry to the cutting bit. Consider plunging the bit down into material. The more the bit is offset from the gantry, the larger the torque generated on the gantry, bearings, etc.

    Instead of using the full size bearing block at the bottom of the z-axis, try using the reduced size one that Ahren sells. The Z-axis plate will be able to clear this bearing block and go lower. With the short bearing blocks, this should be able to let the bottom of the Z-plate go about 1.25" below the bottom of the Z-axis extrusion. If you use a PC892 router, that would put the bottom surface of the collet about 4.9" below the bottom surface of the Z-axis extrusion.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    83
    Ok, got the arm thing you were referring to.
    I've measured the distance from the gantry leg to the Z-plate. In static motor design it is indeed less, however only 0.375" less then in moveable motor design. I don't know if this is significant or can be ignored.
    Thanks for pointing at the low profile block. Unfortunately it has bushing insteat of bearing. And PC routers are impossible to get locally, I'm thinking of Bosh, Hitachi or Cress, so the lowest travel point of Z-plate is important to me 'cause it may be the start of the collet with some routers.
    I'll thinks some more and "play" with both models but I'm leaning towards moveable motor design.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1086
    jsheerin, thanks for giving good advice while I'm away from the forum!

    Ilya, first of all, let me say that I think your approach will work well, and it looks like you have a good handle on it. However, I also think you'll find the low profile blocks work really well if you decide to go that route. There were a few issues with the first round of them (the press fit of the bushing was too heavy, causing some people to have to re-drill the bushings). However, this has been resolved now, and every block is checked for fit with a piece of precision rod before entering inventory. The motion is very smooth, despite the lack of a rolling element.

    Also, if you're considering a Hitachi router, K2CNC sells a mount that bolts right on to my z-plate. It's set up to be mounted as low as possible on the z-plate to maximize travel. You can get about 5" of part height under it this way. Just FYI.

    Best regards,

    Ahren
    www.cncrouterparts.com

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    83
    Ahren,
    Thanks for chiming in.
    I think I'll put the low profile bearing block in my BOM and if this design won't satisfy me it would be easy to convert it to the more common one.
    I'd really love to use the K2CNC holders, but I need to decide on a router. Since I don't have any experience with this I'll rely on some knowledgeable persons oppinion. I know that Hitachi is a variable speed router and I think it's a benefit. However I'm curious about other options available.
    Now, there's a question. I'm not going to use a drill rod. Do I still need to sandwitch the bearing blocks with washers between shaft collars or would it be sufficient to clamp the outer edges of the screw (as pictured at dumpstercnc site)? This is really important 'cause all those washers and collars are quite pricey and I don't want to stockpile them at home if they are not needed.

    EDIT: Ahren, I've just remembered of 2 more questions. 1st - can I use M8 screws with the bearing block? I'd like to keep it metric where possible. 2nd - what is the distance between holes in pre-drilled steel rails? Is it something like 3"? And what's an offset of the first hole from the edge? 1.5"? I guess the holes are for 5/16 screws, right?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1086
    Ilya,
    The washers, needle bearings and shaft collars are there to provide resistance to thrust -- they have nothing to do with the drill rod. If you don't have this sandwich, your motor will be taking up all the thrust loads, which its bearings are not designed to handle. You can still accomplish the sandwich without using drill rod, however -- the same concept applies.

    You can use M8 screws in lieu of 5/16 -- they're almost the same size. For the pre-drilled rails, it depends on which rail you are talking about, but most ar 4" apart. Contact Nate at www.finelineautomation.com -- those are his products, and he's happy to send you a drawing of them.

    Best regards,

    Ahren
    www.cncrouterparts.com

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    83
    Ahren,
    Thanks for clearing this for me, now I get the concept. Is there any difference if the acme screw is locked at one bearing block like this:

    acme screw - collar - thrust bearing - bearing block 1 - thrust bearing - collar ===(acme)=== bearing block 2

    Or between two:

    acme screw - collar - thrust bearing - bearing block 1 ===(acme)=== bearing block 2 - thrust bearing - collar

    Pardon my crude description, I can't upload pictures from my phone.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1086
    Ilya,
    Either way should work. For super-precision setups, the bearings are typically set up around one bearing block to avoid stress if the screw grows due to thermal changes. For wood routers, however, this is rarely a concern. Additionally, by spreading the thrust bearings between two blocks, you can tension the screw between them, which can help to prevent whip at higher speeds.

    Ahren
    www.cncrouterparts.com

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    65
    on your z-design, i have a 12" tall z with a 9" screw and get 7" of travel from it. the gantry clears the stock by 4" , and i can get my collect to with in a 1/2" of the deck. you can probally shorten your z a lot if you just think kinda creatively. i also used the cnc router parts.com parts

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    83
    Ok. Here's the first update on the build.
    It took a while to gather the funds and order stuff. Since I have to order most of the parts from America it took about three weeks for each parcel to get here. And don't even get me started about customs (I have luckily avoided any problems so far though). Strangely, the first package arrived with no problems, but to get the other two I had to go to customs first to settle everything. The contents of the packages was identical, so go figure...
    Anyway, here are 3 parcels with 8020 extrusions - we had to split the order to make the packages fit the international post restrictions on size and weight. Finally I've gathered all the extrusions at my house.
    Didn't realized how bulky the 8020 15xx series is. Untill I actually took it in my hands. You can't really judge from the pictures. Will see how it works out
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Parcel-1_1s.jpg   Parcel-1_2s.jpg   Parcel-1_3s.jpg   Parcel-1_5s.jpg  

    Parcel-1_6s.jpg   Parcel-2_1s.jpg   Parcel-2_3s.jpg   Parcel-2_4s.jpg  

    Parcel-2_6s.jpg   Parcel-3_2s.jpg   Full-set_1s.jpg   Full-set_2s.jpg  

    Full-set_3s.jpg  

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    83
    A quick update on the progress.
    I've assembled the base, the table and Z-axis. I'm still waiting for the ACMEs and some small mechanical parts. I hope they'll arrive soon.
    I must say that the carriages are behaving very well. Somewhat difficult to adjust at first, but it gets faster when you get used to this process. The build feels very solid. I can't say now how much time and effort would it take to square the machine, but all key components are adjustable, so i guess it won't be too difficult.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails base-and-table.jpg   z-axis_1.jpg   z-axis_2.jpg  

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1086
    Ilya,
    Looking really good! I'm excited to see your machine come together!

    Ahren
    www.cncrouterparts.com

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    9
    That looks fantastic. I don't suppose you would consider posting your parts list? With or without prices (minus shipping); either would be awesome. This is almost exactly what I've been trying to picture in my head so it would sure help.

    -Brian

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    83
    Quote Originally Posted by Pukwudji View Post
    That looks fantastic. I don't suppose you would consider posting your parts list? With or without prices (minus shipping); either would be awesome. This is almost exactly what I've been trying to picture in my head so it would sure help.

    -Brian
    Brian,
    Thanks for your comments.
    Actually, I'm thoroughly documenting my build. I have all the BOMs needed with exact pricing and part numbers. I take photos of every step of the assembly process, and put them into a html tutorial together with detailed comments.
    I won't give such information out for free. Sorry, I've invested a huge amount of time and money researching and putting together the model etc. However I'll see how the build turns out and if the machine is worth repeating by others I'll offer all this info at e-bay for a small fee.
    I hope to finish my machine in about a month.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    267
    Quote Originally Posted by ilya View Post
    I won't give such information out for free. Sorry, I've invested a huge amount of time and money researching and putting together the model etc.
    Post it and use Google Ads. The revenues you get from the ads will pay for it. You will even make revenue with people who kick the tires and are not even going to build one.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    438
    Quote Originally Posted by Pukwudji View Post
    That looks fantastic. I don't suppose you would consider posting your parts list? With or without prices (minus shipping); either would be awesome. This is almost exactly what I've been trying to picture in my head so it would sure help.

    -Brian
    http://www.cncrouterparts.com/
    http://www.finelineautomation.com/

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    83
    Here are some more pictures.
    The build was delayed twice. Both reasons were because of the post service. The parcel with ACMEs arrived without screws so I had to order another one. Now I'm waiting for clamps and couplers which were sent more than a month ago. This is the last package I need to for the machine to make its first cut.

    I've aligned the machine and X, Y and Z axes are square within 0.1 mm (0.005"), the table is flat within 0.25 mm (0.01"). I'm going to flycut the table anyway however.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails machine1.jpg   machine2.jpg   machine3.jpg  

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12

    Thumbs up Profiting from the Community

    Quote Originally Posted by ilya View Post
    Brian,
    I won't give such information out for free. Sorry, I've invested a huge amount of time and money researching and putting together the model etc.
    So apparently you don't mind taking from the community but sharing a parts list is too much to ask for. If I ever see you asking for help I will be sure to first make sure you are willing to pay for it.

    No loss though because other people have made pretty much the same exact machine and don't feel the need to profit from the information. Here is a complete BOM with prices:

    Hobby Robotics » My CNC Engraver (Part 1)

Page 1 of 2 12

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 271
    Last Post: 02-27-2009, 06:36 PM
  2. Converting DSP controller system to Mach based system.
    By Marwell in forum Machines running Mach Software
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-20-2008, 12:00 AM
  3. Interesting video - GIDeS++ - Gesture-Based Cad System
    By Splint in forum Uncategorised CAM Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-07-2007, 05:42 PM
  4. MicroController/DSP based Motion interface
    By Haz in forum CNC Machine Related Electronics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-22-2007, 09:54 PM
  5. 8020 linear motion products
    By bb99 in forum DIY CNC Router Table Machines
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-08-2003, 09:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •