![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
umniy2000
...I believe that this concept is fundamentally wrong. There will be variations in the parts diameter after turning; variations in the fixture machined holes and half-moons in the clamping bar. This may result in un-equal clamping of 6 parts and some of the parts not being clamped at all. I am not sure if the clamping bolts can elastically bend the clamp bar every time to conform to slight variations and looseness......
Thank you for the input.
The concept is fundamentally okay; for 60 parts per run it is bordering on a waste of time. We use fixtures with a similar split clamping design for dozens of different parts but these are for repeat runs of up to 1000 three or four times a year. You are correct about the split clamp using a long bar being not very accomodating of OD variations; we find the OED has to be maintained with less than +/-0.001" otherwise parts can spin in the holder. Alternatively the clamping bar can be split into sections each clamping two parts in a balanced manner.
It also seems a bit illogical to have two fixtures and relocate the parts for the milling operations. Ours all clamp onto a base mounted on a rotary table so that all the milling can be done using a single fixturing which results in one alignment procedure and all the milled features have the correct relationship to each other. If a rotary is not available an alternative is to have the fixture that clamps the parts, attach to two or more bases in different alignments so it is not necessary to re-align six parts, just one full assembly.
But what are you going to do? It seems you are faced with making it work.
An open mind is a virtue...so long as all the common sense has not leaked out.