Originally Posted by
wizard
Well you can always to a CNC conversion of a Chinese mill. Selection of the mill might be a problem as one that gives you 10 + inches of "Y" travel is a big problem. Big as in large mill, remember that not only does the mill have to move the table ten plus inches it has to be able to support the part when doing that. Given the right design it might be possible to do half, flip and do the rest but getting the registration right might not be fun. Further Chinese mills for the most part come with rather slow speed spindles but that should not scare you off because there are many approaches to high speed spindle solutions. The bigger negative for you is that this path is expensive even as a DIY conversion.
Spindle speed is an issue for lots of things, but as has been mentioned flipping the part might be an option. I did a mold for an associate that required me to stack plates and machine both sides of some of them. I started with a base plate with a centering register (pocket) and two alignment pins centered based on the register. Then every plate was predrilled to match the alignment pins. Then every plate was machined on the jig. Those that needed to be machined on both sides were simply flipped and clamped down.
Another approach would be a fixed gantry moving table router/mill build from scratch.
That is an excellent option. A fixed gantry can be very rigid and given the shallow profile parts he can even add central angular bracing with only modest difficult.
You might be able to come up with something cheaper than a conversion mill but doing a really good job requires access to a mill at the very least.
I disagree. Not in general, but in principal. Often cheap machine tools are used to make better machine tools for those who have time, but not money. Yes it would be a huge pain to layout and cut pieces to make a larger gantry on a smaller gantry, but it can be done.
I'm not thinking your run of the mill light duty router here but rather something substantial enough that you can machine metals beyond Aluminum.
Even for aluminum rigidity is an issue. I make a molds in aluminum and currently use a couple small desktop mills for it. I see issues anytime I get about 1/8" (3.175mm apx) cutter size and take modestly heavy cuts. I can get good cuts by taking care with my lead in and lead out, and buy taking lighter roughing cuts and always making a nice finish cut to complete. I do some light steel work on one of my small mills, and I take the same approach. Lighter than calculated cuts, and always a finish cut.
This isn't a simple machine to design or build but a gantry that bridges a 12-16 inch cutting zone isn't impossible with modest equipment.
No, but its not rocket science either. The draw back again is that your envelope in Y (or) will be more than twice your travel. There is atleast one commercially made cast iron gantry design sold as a mold cutter that uses this format though. If I was into foundry work I would probably make one myself. As it is I do plan to make some braced fixed gantry machines out of aluminum at some point to replace my desktop machines for most shallow work.
You would also have the same issues with a high speed spindle suitable for engraving and a more general machining spindle.
High speed spindles are invaluable tools for small cutter machining. For wood you can use a wood router with very good results. For aluminum you really have to run coolant at those speeds, so a wood router might be dangerous with its open architecture drawing atmosphere through the electrical components of the motor so a water soluble coolant is definitely out. Even with some form of light oil the heat from heavy cutting will kill the router fairly quickly. (I know I have killed a bunch of them.) This leaves you looking at the sealed water cooled spindles. I have one that turns 10000-40000 rpm, but I don't know how well it will last yet, and it was farily expensive even as a cheap Chinese motor. Go with a domestic brand and the price of the spindle dwarfs the price of the rest of your build. If you do a lot though it might be worth it.
In either case above good ball screws and other components will set you back some.
Lubrication is as important as initial quality for longevity. Perhaps more so. Depending on what you have access too, and depending on how important feed rate is to you... you can get very good accuracy and repeatability with quality acme screws and double spring loaded acme nuts. (Not pinch nuts. Double nuts. ) Better than aerospace requirements if you take the time to map your screws. Ball screws though require only lubrication for the life of the screw. Even with ball screws if you want best accuracy and repeatable performance you need to double nut them. They will however turn much easier (and faster) than an acme screw. My fastest stepper driven acme machine stalls at about 80ipm (2000mm/m) under cutting loads. My cheapest ballscrew machine stalls at over 600ipm (15000mm/m) and cuts just fine at upto 150ipm (3800mm/m).
If you intend to do a lot of work with 0.8 mm end mills I suspect that good quality ball screws would be required.
Required? No. Highly recommended... absolutely. They are also much less likely to bind under heavy load. They are far superior in almost every respect, but its is not impossible to get quality results with other components.
Bob La Londe
http://www.YumaBassMan.com