God's green, I like that but I know it is not the "green" your refering to. I agree with the questionable and unproven concept of GW/Climate change or whatever they are calling it today. Likewise for 70+ years we have been lied to and had blatant propaganda forced down our throats at our own expense no less about the evils of a dried plant material. Total BS lies made up again and again to this very day about the affects of marijuana. I always like to consider the source when such data is made public. If you'll notice most every case study was performed by some government agency who has it in their best interest to make sure the findings are BAD BAD so they can justify their miserable existence trying to force their moral values down the rest of our throats. These studies are also done by researchers who owe their jobs to the drug warriors and will guess what always find that the people paying them are correct, go figure.
The bottom line is that for a drug to make it through 3 phases of clinical trials and pass FDA approval for sale to the public only a few thousand people at most are tested with the drug. Out of those few thousand if only as many as 30% showed positive results from taking the drugs the drug is then considered a success and made available for public consumption.
I would contend that no DRUG has EVER had a larger test pool or as many hundreds of years of efficacy testing as marijuana has had since man has been using it. Find me ANY drug that has had more users (besides alcohol although even it was not around till long after marijuana was in use by man) test it out before it was put up for sale. You will be looking a long time because none exist.
The problem with the war on drugs is that its a moral war. People say oh alcohol is legal pot is not so thats that. This is to simplistic a viewpoint in that I make no distinction between the two since they are both inclined to impair you in some fashion. One poster said he prefers reality and only has a glass of wine once in awhile. While I have no issue with that I wonder if the poster would consider themselves an alcoholic as well? The reason I ask is that according to the anti-pot crowd ANY amount of use makes you a drug addict. Thus using this logic one can only conclude that any amount of alcohol intake means you are an alcoholic.
If your ever debating the War with anyone and they drink alcohol ask them if they are alcoholics and see what happens. Also ask them if the government was to suddenly today decide once again that liquor and beer are illegal if they would rush home and drain every last bottle of booze and beer down their sinks? Nothing like showing the hypocrisy of the hypocrit to them. Although it will be usually for nothing because they only care about what YOUR doing not what they are.
Until everyone is ready to let me come into their homes and tell them what they can and can not do or can or can not own, they pretty much just need to shut the hell up. If your a working upstanding citizen that happens to endulge in things others do not and you bring no harm to others knock yourself out what do I care. I care more that there are those who would strip me of my rights in order to attempt to stop someone else from using a drug then I will ever care about that person using the drug. You pay your own way in life and it should be no ones business what anyone else does in their own homes. Why this is so damn hard to understand in a country thats supposed to be the most FREE country of all is beyond me. America can be free or it can be drug free there is no inbetween. In order to be drug free you will have to forfiet your rights as a citizen and in fact you already have in MANY instances in the name of this war. Now how much closer are they to winning it exactly? Is 0% a success? One could even argue its WORSE now then when they started. So free do what you want or militant no rights drug free. Sounds so North Korea like to me.
Bo